Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add neuromechanist/research-skills/plugin install grantWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/neuromechanist/research-skills/grant-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/neuromechanist/research-skills/grant-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/neuromechanist/research-skills/grant-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/neuromechanist/research-skills/grant-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/neuromechanist/research-skills/grant-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00180 | $0.01131 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00090 | $0.00566 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00226 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00113 |
Grade A, and why
grant-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 42 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Grant Proposal Review
Routes a grant proposal to an independent, fresh-context reviewer that scores it against the official NIH or NSF criteria and returns a structured review. This skill is a thin dispatcher: it decides how to run the reviewer and in which mode. The review procedure, criteria, scoring rubrics, and output templates all live in references/ and are loaded by the reviewer, not duplicated here.
When to use
Activate when the user wants feedback on a grant proposal (specific aims, research strategy, project description) evaluated against NIH or NSF review criteria.
Why a fresh-context reviewer
Review validity depends on independence: a reviewer that shares the conversation that produced the proposal is biased toward it. Run the reviewer in a separate context and pass only framing (proposal path, mechanism/agency, resubmission status, target program), never the authoring rationale. This is also why the reviewer is a subagent on tools that support one, and an inline procedure where they do not.
Modes (user decides each run)
- Single (default): one independent reviewer applies the full procedure end to end.
- Panel (opt-in): spawn N independent reviewers in parallel, then a synthesis pass. Trigger on "mock study section", "panel review", or an explicit request for multiple reviewers. NIH: 3 reviewers; NSF: 2-3 panelists. Each reviewer scores independently from
references/; a final chair pass reconciles them into one output. Surface genuine disagreement rather than blindly averaging scores.
Dispatch
Pick the branch for the current tool. In every branch the reviewer follows references/review-procedure.md.
- Claude Code:
Task(subagent_type: "grant-review", ...)passing the proposal path, mechanism, and mode. For panel mode, launch oneTaskper reviewer role in parallel, then a final synthesisTask. - Codex CLI: plugin installation exposes this skill, not a Codex subagent. To use a fresh-context Codex reviewer, first copy
agents/templates/grant-review.tomlto~/.codex/agents/or.codex/agents/, then invoke that configured agent if the current Codex surface supports/agent. For panel mode, ensuremax_threadscovers the reviewer count. If no Codex subagent is configured or available, use the fallback branch. - Copilot CLI: plugin installation exposes this skill and, through
.github/plugin/plugin.json, the.agent.mdreviewer inagents/templates/. Invoke that configured agent when the current Copilot surface supports custom agents; use/fleetfor panel mode when available. If running outside a plugin install, copyagents/templates/grant-review.agent.mdto.github/agents/or~/.copilot/agents/. If no custom agent is available, use the fallback branch. - Fallback (no subagent support, or the user wants an interactive in-thread review): first locate the rubric (
$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/skills/grant-review/references, elsefind . -type d -path '*/skills/grant-review/references' | head -1); if it cannot be found, stop and tell the user to install the grant plugin rather than reviewing from memory. Then followreferences/review-procedure.mddirectly in this context.
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- examples/sample-nih-r01-review.md 8.5 KB
- examples/sample-r01-aims.md 3.1 KB
- references/nih-career-training-criteria.md 14 KB
- references/nih-review-criteria.md 12 KB
- references/nsf-review-criteria.md 9.2 KB
- references/review-best-practices.md 13 KB
- references/review-output-templates.md 4.4 KB
- references/review-procedure.md 11 KB
- references/sbir-sttr-review-criteria.md 13 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 42 lines · 180 tokens per session scan A 278afa7508b5
grant-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository neuromechanist/research-skills (45 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed BSD-3-Clause. It adds 180 tokens to every session and 1,131 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
n8n-architect
Use when the user explicitly wants to create, edit, validate, sync, or troubleshoot n8n workflows, asks about n8n nodes or automation, or wants to use n8n-as-code in the current context root.
ai-navigation
Use when implementing AI movement — NavigationAgent2D/3D, steering behaviors, behavior trees, and patrol patterns.
phantom-camera
Use when using the Phantom Camera addon — PhantomCamera2D/3D with priority-based switching, follow and look-at modes, and tween transitions.
3d-essentials
Use when working with 3D-specific systems — materials, lighting, shadows, environment, global illumination, fog, LOD, occlusion culling, and decals in Godot 4.3+.
ability-system
Use when building character abilities — Resource-based abilities with cost/cooldown/cast, buffs/debuffs, stat modifiers, gameplay tags, and HUD binding.
addon-development
Use when creating Godot editor plugins — EditorPlugin, @tool scripts, custom inspectors, and dock panels.