Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add New1Direction/korgex --skill codebase-onboardinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/New1Direction/korgexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/new1direction/korgex/codebase-onboarding)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/new1direction/korgex/codebase-onboarding"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/new1direction/korgex/codebase-onboarding/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/new1direction/korgex/codebase-onboarding"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/new1direction/korgex/codebase-onboarding.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.01968 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00787 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00394 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00197 |
Grade A, and why
codebase-onboarding scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to codebase-onboarding — 25 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 234 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Codebase Onboarding
Systematically analyze an unfamiliar codebase and produce a structured onboarding guide. Designed for developers joining a new project or setting up Claude Code in an existing repo for the first time.
When to Use
- First time opening a project with Claude Code
- Joining a new team or repository
- User asks "help me understand this codebase"
- User asks to generate a CLAUDE.md for a project
- User says "onboard me" or "walk me through this repo"
How It Works
Phase 1: Reconnaissance
Gather raw signals about the project without reading every file. Run these checks in parallel:
1. Package manifest detection
→ package.json, go.mod, Cargo.toml, pyproject.toml, pom.xml, build.gradle,
Gemfile, composer.json, mix.exs, pubspec.yaml
2. Framework fingerprinting
→ next.config.*, nuxt.config.*, angular.json, vite.config.*,
django settings, flask app factory, fastapi main, rails config
3. Entry point identification
→ main.*, index.*, app.*, server.*, cmd/, src/main/
4. Directory structure snapshot
→ Top 2 levels of the directory tree, ignoring node_modules, vendor,
.git, dist, build, __pycache__, .next
5. Config and tooling detection
→ .eslintrc*, .prettierrc*, tsconfig.json, Makefile, Dockerfile,
docker-compose*, .github/workflows/, .env.example, CI configs
6. Test structure detection
→ tests/, test/, __tests__/, *_test.go, *.spec.ts, *.test.js,
pytest.ini, jest.config.*, vitest.config.*
Phase 2: Architecture Mapping
From the reconnaissance data, identify:
Tech Stack
- Language(s) and version constraints
- Framework(s) and major libraries
- Database(s) and ORMs
- Build tools and bundlers
- CI/CD platform
Architecture Pattern
- Monolith, monorepo, microservices, or serverless
- Frontend/backend split or full-stack
- API style: REST, GraphQL, gRPC, tRPC
Key Directories Map the top-level directories to their purpose:
src/components/ → React UI components
src/api/ → API route handlers
src/lib/ → Shared utilities
src/db/ → Database models and migrations
tests/ → Test suites
scripts/ → Build and deployment scripts
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 234 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 716e42006634
codebase-onboarding is a skill published in the GitHub repository New1Direction/korgex (5 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,968 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to codebase-onboarding, differing in 25 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
vibe-security
A defensive security review workflow for code, dependencies, and application configuration. It checks for vulnerabilities such as unsafe input handling, unauthorized access, exposed sensitive data, and known problems in installed packages.
vibe-review
Use this skill to perform code reviews, checking for quality, security, and standard compliance.
gh-find-prs
Survey open Codewhale PRs and triage each for mergeability and disposition against the real landing branch.
review
Diff-scoped correctness review that reads the codebase around the change — callers, contracts, and invariants — and returns line-anchored findings ranked by severity with confidence, then a merge-risk verdict. Use for reviewing a PR, diff, or named change set. Not for style review, approvals-as-rubber-stamp, or…
simplify
Review recent code changes for reuse, code quality, and efficiency, then directly apply straightforward cleanup improvements. Use when the user wants a post-implementation cleanup pass, pre-PR polish, or asks to simplify/refine recent changes. Invoke with /simplify or /simplify .
find-simplifications
Use for a periodic repo-wide sweep of qwen-code for accumulated excess surface — dead components and files, orphaned locale keys, exports nothing consumes, added-then-removed scaffolding — filing candidates on a tracking issue and landing only what a maintainer has said yes to. Repo-wide and evidence-first; every…