Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nexscope-ai/eCommerce-Skills --skill review-monitoringgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nexscope-ai/eCommerce-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nexscope-ai/ecommerce-skills/review-monitoring)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nexscope-ai/ecommerce-skills/review-monitoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nexscope-ai/ecommerce-skills/review-monitoring/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nexscope-ai/ecommerce-skills/review-monitoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nexscope-ai/ecommerce-skills/review-monitoring.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk warn
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 21 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00515 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00258 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00103 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
review-monitoring scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 64 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Monitoring 👁️
Set up systematic review monitoring across e-commerce platforms. Track new reviews, detect negative review spikes, monitor competitor reviews, and automate review response workflows.
Supported platforms: Amazon, Shopify, WooCommerce, Walmart, TikTok Shop, Etsy, eBay, BigCommerce.
Built by Nexscope — your AI assistant for smarter e-commerce decisions.
Install
npx skills add nexscope-ai/eCommerce-Skills --skill review-monitoring -g
Usage
Set up a review monitoring system for my products. I sell on Amazon (3 ASINs) and Etsy (15 listings). I want to catch negative reviews within 24 hours.
Capabilities
- Multi-platform review monitoring setup (Amazon, Etsy, Walmart, Shopify)
- Negative review alert framework and response templates
- Review velocity tracking and anomaly detection
- Competitor review monitoring strategy
- Review response best practices by platform
- Review solicitation compliance guide (per platform rules)
How This Skill Works
Step 1: Collect information from the user's message — product, platform, current situation, and goals.
Step 2: Ask one follow-up with all remaining questions using multiple-choice format. Allow shorthand answers (e.g., "1b 2c 3a").
Step 3: Research and analyze using the frameworks and methodology below.
Step 4: Deliver structured, actionable output with specific recommendations, not vague advice.
Output Format
- Start with a summary of findings
- Include specific data points and benchmarks where available
- Provide prioritized action items
- Mark estimates with ⚠️ when based on incomplete data
- End with concrete next steps
Other Skills
More e-commerce skills: nexscope-ai/eCommerce-Skills
Amazon-specific skills: nexscope-ai/Amazon-Skills
Built by Nexscope — your AI assistant for smarter e-commerce decisions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 64 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 7f6fcba043f7
review-monitoring is a skill published in the GitHub repository nexscope-ai/eCommerce-Skills (914 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 515 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
buyer-intent-writer
Write or rewrite ecommerce product descriptions, bullets, buying-guide sections, and landing-page copy around verified buyer needs, objections, comparisons, and purchase intent. Use when the user asks for buyer-intent copy, product copy, conversion copy, or a clearer product description. Do not use for technical…
competitor-seo-analyzer
Compare observable ecommerce competitor SEO, content, structured-data, trust, and buyer-intent signals. Use when the user asks for competitor SEO analysis, an SEO comparison, content gaps, or a comparison of supplied pages, listings, exports, or search evidence. Do not infer live rankings, traffic, backlinks, or AI…
ecommerce-geo-auditor
Diagnose an ecommerce page or listing for GEO, AI-search, AI-citation, and AI-shopping readiness using inspected page evidence, supplied content, or crawl data. Use when the user asks for a GEO audit, AI visibility readiness check, AI search audit, citation-readiness review, or why a product is hard for AI systems to…
ecommerce-geo-optimizer
Turn verified ecommerce GEO, AI-search, or AI-citation readiness gaps into a prioritized implementation plan covering content, product facts, technical access, structured data, trust, and measurement. Use when the user asks to improve GEO, optimize for AI search, fix a GEO audit, or create an AI visibility readiness…
ecommerce-seo-auditor
Audit ecommerce websites, product pages, collection pages, and marketplace listings for technical SEO, crawlability, indexability, on-page relevance, content, internal linking, product data, images, and Core Web Vitals. Use when the user asks for an ecommerce SEO audit, store SEO checkup, product-page review…
geo-content-optimizer
Rewrite ecommerce product, category, store, or marketplace content so verified facts are clear, specific, structured, and answer-ready for GEO, AI search, and AI citations. Use when the user asks to optimize content for GEO, AI search, AI answers, citations, or clearer product facts. Do not perform a technical audit…