Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog/code-reviewernpx skills add nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog --skill code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nguyenthienthanh/aura-frogWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.00872 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00436 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00174 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AI-consumed reference. Optimized for Claude to read during execution. Human-readable explanation: see docs/architecture/HIERARCHICAL_PLANNING.md or docs/getting-started/ depending on topic.
Code Reviewer
Use after implementation, Phase 4, or before merge.
Process
git diff --name-only main...HEAD→ changed files- Run 6-aspect review
- Report + decision
6 Aspects
aspects[6]{aspect,weight,checks}:
Security,CRITICAL,"Secrets, injection, auth gaps, CSRF/CORS"
Architecture,HIGH,"SRP, coupling, wrong layer, edge cases"
Error Handling,HIGH,"Unhandled rejections, empty catch, silent failures"
Test Gaps,HIGH,"Untested critical paths, missing edge/boundary cases"
Type Safety,MEDIUM,"Missing types, any usage, null gaps"
Simplification,LOW,"Complex conditionals, deep nesting — only if harms readability"
Spend 60% on Security + Architecture + Edge Cases. Don't nitpick syntax — linters handle that.
Report
[ASPECT] [SEVERITY] file:line — description → Fix: recommendation
CRITICAL = block merge | WARNING = should fix | INFO = nice to have
Decision
- APPROVED — 0 critical, ≤3 warnings
- CHANGES REQUESTED — any critical finding
Scoring (prevents LGTM drift)
Per-aspect breakdown required. Anchors: 9-10 production-ready, 7-8 minor issues, 5-6 needs work, <5 changes requested.
Block Merge On
Hardcoded secrets, injection, missing auth on protected routes, breaking changes without migration.
Mandatory Verification for Claims (CoVe)
Before reporting "0 critical findings" / "N% coverage" / "tests pass", run the Chain-of-Verification protocol from skills/chain-of-verification/SKILL.md. Draft → plan 3–5 verification questions → answer via tool (Read/Grep/Bash) → revise. Per rules/workflow/chain-of-verification.md this is mandatory — reviews without verified claims are not acceptable.
Related Rules
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 85 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A be179bc53309
code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog (24 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 872 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
openspec-plus-apply
MANDATORY skill that activates whenever the OpenSpec apply phase begins. Triggers: /opsx-apply runs, the openspec-apply-change vanilla skill is referenced or active, openspec instructions apply is invoked, or the user asks to implement, apply, execute, or build out an OpenSpec change ('implement the change', 'apply…
openspec-plus-design
MANDATORY skill that activates whenever the OpenSpec design phase begins. Triggers: /opsx-new or /opsx-continue runs; openspec-new-change, openspec-continue-change, or openspec-explore is active; openspec instructions design is invoked; or the user wants to create, update, review, refine, or discuss an OpenSpec design…
openspec-plus-spec
MANDATORY skill that activates whenever the OpenSpec specification phase begins. Triggers: /opsx-new or /opsx-continue runs; openspec-new-change, openspec-continue-change, or openspec-explore is active; openspec instructions spec or openspec instructions specs is invoked; or the user wants to create, update, review…
openspec-plus-tdd
MANDATORY skill that activates whenever code is written to implement an OpenSpec change task. Triggers: openspec-plus-apply is active, /opsx-apply is running, the user is implementing tasks from an OpenSpec change, an implementer subagent dispatched by openspec-plus-apply is starting work, or the user invokes phrases…
openspec-plus-proposal
MANDATORY skill that activates whenever the OpenSpec proposal phase begins. Triggers: /opsx-new or /opsx-continue runs; openspec-new-change, openspec-continue-change, or openspec-explore is active; openspec instructions proposal is invoked; or the user wants to create, update, review, refine, or discuss an OpenSpec…
openspec-plus-tasks
MANDATORY skill that activates whenever the OpenSpec tasks phase begins. Triggers: /opsx-new or /opsx-continue runs; openspec-new-change, openspec-continue-change, or openspec-explore is active; openspec instructions tasks is invoked; or the user wants to create, update, review, refine, or discuss an OpenSpec tasks.md…