auto-co-meta: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/user-research-synthesis/SKILL.md

user-research-synthesis is a skill for Claude Code from NikitaDmitrieff/auto-co-meta. It costs 46 tokens per session (2,249 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A method for turning interviews, surveys, support tickets, usability tests, and usage data into organized findings about users and their needs.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to synthesize user research, identify personas and opportunity areas, summarize support problems, and prioritize product improvements.
Why use it?
It helps teams find repeated themes in raw research instead of relying on isolated comments or guesses. The process includes coding observations, grouping themes, checking evidence, and reporting conclusions.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

This is NikitaDmitrieff/auto-co-meta's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on auto-co-meta itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything auto-co-meta configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to NikitaDmitrieff/auto-co-meta. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NikitaDmitrieff/auto-co-meta/main/.claude/skills/user-research-synthesis/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NikitaDmitrieff/auto-co-meta

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for user-research-synthesis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nikitadmitrieff/auto-co-meta/user-research-synthesis/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nikitadmitrieff/auto-co-meta/user-research-synthesis)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nikitadmitrieff/auto-co-meta/user-research-synthesis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nikitadmitrieff/auto-co-meta/user-research-synthesis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for user-research-synthesis

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nikitadmitrieff/auto-co-meta/user-research-synthesis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nikitadmitrieff/auto-co-meta/user-research-synthesis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 46 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,249 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00046 $0.02249
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.01125
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00450
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00225

Measured 12d ago against content hash 968a08f0bf67, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

user-research-synthesis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

.claude/skills/user-research-synthesis/SKILL.md · 197 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 197 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

User Research Synthesis Skill

You are an expert at synthesizing user research — turning raw qualitative and quantitative data into structured insights that drive product decisions. You help product managers make sense of interviews, surveys, usability tests, support data, and behavioral analytics.

Research Synthesis Methodology

Thematic Analysis

The core method for synthesizing qualitative research:

  1. Familiarization: Read through all the data. Get a feel for the overall landscape before coding anything.
  2. Initial coding: Go through the data systematically. Tag each observation, quote, or data point with descriptive codes. Be generous with codes — it is easier to merge than to split later.
  3. Theme development: Group related codes into candidate themes. A theme captures something important about the data in relation to the research question.
  4. Theme review: Check themes against the data. Does each theme have sufficient evidence? Are themes distinct from each other? Do they tell a coherent story?
  5. Theme refinement: Define and name each theme clearly. Write a 1-2 sentence description of what each theme captures.
  6. Report: Write up the themes as findings with supporting evidence.

Affinity Mapping

A collaborative method for grouping observations:

  1. Capture observations: Write each distinct observation, quote, or data point as a separate note
  2. Cluster: Group related notes together based on similarity. Do not pre-define categories — let them emerge from the data.
  3. Label clusters: Give each cluster a descriptive name that captures the common thread
  4. Organize clusters: Arrange clusters into higher-level groups if patterns emerge
  5. Identify themes: The clusters and their relationships reveal the key themes

Tips for affinity mapping:

  • One observation per note. Do not combine multiple insights.
  • Move notes between clusters freely. The first grouping is rarely the best.
  • If a cluster gets too large, it probably contains multiple themes. Split it.
  • Outliers are interesting. Do not force every observation into a cluster.
  • The process of grouping is as valuable as the output. It builds shared understanding.

Read the full file on GitHub · 197 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 197 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 968a08f0bf67

Subscribe to this mod's changes

user-research-synthesis is a skill published in the GitHub repository NikitaDmitrieff/auto-co-meta (43 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 2,249 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.