Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nikolamin/claude-coordinator-kit --skill execute-loopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nikolamin/claude-coordinator-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nikolamin/claude-coordinator-kit/execute-loop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nikolamin/claude-coordinator-kit/execute-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nikolamin/claude-coordinator-kit/execute-loop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nikolamin/claude-coordinator-kit/execute-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nikolamin/claude-coordinator-kit/execute-loop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.01955 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00782 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00391 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00196 |
Grade A, and why
execute-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 28d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 129 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Execute loop
Follow the required coordinator cycle after every request, answer, agent result and wakeup, and before waiting. Pending questions must actually be asked; available capacity must take authorized work. A status report is not completion of this cycle.
Apply the runtime adapter for native delegation, model settings, instruction files and missing capabilities. Never assume a Claude-specific tool exists in Codex.
The coordinator delegates implementation, investigation, and verification. Run database ensure,
finish pending migration reconciliation, then read the profile and current task records (coordinator-kit:coordination-state); project topology,
authorization, and model choices override defaults. A repository push may itself deploy or
publish: use the recorded trigger map, never infer permission from a branch or host name.
Dispatch and delivery
- Select an authorized, unblocked task by recorded queue order, priority and dependencies.
Define and queue new requests through
coordinator-kit:backlog-discipline; do not preempt active work without an explicit reprioritization or applicable incident policy. Preserve the founder's original request alongside acceptance criteria. Before implementing an old ticket, have the agent cheaply test its premise: already fixed, wrong cause, and not reproducible are useful findings, not invitations to invent a change. Correct stale records at their source. - Claim a lane before dispatch. Record task/agent id, repository and checkout, branch, owned
paths, external resources, stage, model, start time, expected duration, and report path.
Give the agent a bounded brief using
coordinator-kit:agent-brief-hygiene. - Select and record the verification policy before dispatch. Routine work uses builder acceptance and affected checks, with the required suite once at the final push gate; high-risk work adds independent adversarial verification and failure-mechanism checks. An authorized urgent TEST revert can use that policy's narrow gate. Existing project requirements and release authority still apply.
- A failed independent verification gets a fresh fixer with the exact gap and on-disk evidence. Allow at
most two fix/re-verify cycles on the same gap after the initial failure; if the second cycle
also fails (third failure overall), escalate via
coordinator-kit:escalation. A new agent does not reset the counter. Do not resume a large completed transcript merely to continue work; a status-only probe to a still-running agent is different. - Establish the push gate below, then commit/push only what the project's authorization permits. An assigned agent may snapshot its own work before verification when local commits are authorized; otherwise preserve a patch. This does not expand the coordinator's product-commit exception, authorize a push, or allow sweeping another agent's changes into the snapshot.
- Check the actual post-push outcome. Record built, verified, pushed, on-test, on-prod, and
awaiting-user-validation separately; a server half without its required client is not a
completed user goal. Dispatch a deployed-flow check when the criteria require one.
When release approval is the only remaining step, set
awaiting_releasewith target/evidence and queue its linked decision immediately. For user-initiated next actions, keep the current state plus that flag and await the user's initiation without proposing a release question. - Persist the result, release the lane when no writer/test/mutation process still owns it, and immediately run the required cycle: present the next question and dispatch the next authorized unblocked task independently. Do not ask whether to continue approved work or wait for all lanes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 28d ago Changed · +3 lines 043bde7596eb
- 1mo ago Changed · +10 lines 73d7923706ca
- 1mo ago Changed · -33 lines · -198 tokens per session c6176f7cb88c
- 2mo ago Changed · +11 lines · +19 tokens per session 58705295a39b
- 2mo ago First seen · 138 lines · 237 tokens per session scan A 71317ce9b812
execute-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository nikolamin/claude-coordinator-kit (2 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,955 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
execute-loop compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| execute-loopnikolamin/claude-coordinator-kit | Skill | 2 | 29d ago | MIT | A | 58 | Claude Code |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 134k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | today | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 99k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 314k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | today | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |
| chat-pet-sprite-creationmicrosoft/vscode | Skill | 195k | today | MIT | A | 53 | Claude Code, Codex |