Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-architecturenpx skills add nishilbhave/codeprobe --skill codeprobe-architecturegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nishilbhave/codeprobeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-architecture)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-architecture.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00065 | $0.02751 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01375 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00550 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00275 |
Grade A, and why
codeprobe-architecture scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 145 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Standalone Mode
If invoked directly (not via the orchestrator), you must first:
- Read
../codeprobe/shared-preamble.md(resolve relative to this SKILL.md's location — the siblingcodeprobeskill directory — not the user's project) for the output contract, execution modes, and constraints. - Load applicable reference files from
../codeprobe/references/(same resolution) based on the project's tech stack. - Default to
fullmode unless the user specifies otherwise.
Architecture & Structure Analyzer
Domain Scope
This sub-skill detects architectural and structural issues across these categories:
- Layer Violations — Business logic in controllers, presentation logic in models, database access in views
- Circular Dependencies — Direct or transitive circular imports between modules
- God Objects — Oversized files and classes that do too much
- Anemic Domain Model — Entity classes with no behavior, all logic in service classes
- Missing Boundaries — No clear module/domain separation, cross-feature coupling
- Directory Structure — Framework convention violations, flat directory anti-patterns
- Config/Environment — Hardcoded environment values, missing config abstraction
What It Does NOT Flag
- Small projects/scripts with fewer than 5 files — flat structure is appropriate for small codebases and adding layers would be over-engineering.
- Microservices that intentionally have thin layers — a microservice with a single controller, single service, and single repository is fine by design.
- Framework-standard monolith patterns that are idiomatic — e.g., Laravel's default structure for small-to-medium apps, Rails convention-over-configuration patterns, Next.js app directory conventions.
- Prototypes and proof-of-concept code clearly marked as such.
- Generated code directories (e.g.,
dist/,build/,.next/,__pycache__/).
Detection Instructions
Layer Violations
| ID Prefix | What to Detect | How to Detect | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
ARCH |
Controllers containing business logic | Scan files in controller directories (controllers/, Controllers/, routes/, api/). Flag controllers that contain: database queries (SQL, ORM query builders beyond simple find()/findById()), complex conditionals with business rules (3+ branches), calculations, data transformations, or validation logic beyond simple field presence checks. Controllers should delegate to services/actions. |
Major |
ARCH |
Models/entities containing presentation logic | Scan model/entity files. Flag models that contain: HTML generation, string formatting for display (e.g., toHtml(), formatForDisplay()), view-specific transformations, CSS class computation, or response formatting. Models should contain domain logic, not presentation. |
Major |
ARCH |
Views/components calling database directly | Scan view files (.blade.php, .vue, .jsx/.tsx components, .ejs, .pug, Jinja templates). Flag views that contain: direct database queries, ORM calls, raw SQL, or repository method calls. Views should receive data from controllers/props, never fetch it themselves. |
Major |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 145 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 953e4fc0925f
codeprobe-architecture is a skill published in the GitHub repository nishilbhave/codeprobe (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 2,751 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…