codeprobe-code-smells

codeprobe-code-smells is a skill for Claude Code from nishilbhave/codeprobe. It costs 77 tokens per session (2,614 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-quality checker that finds common design and readability problems, such as very long methods, large classes, dead code, magic numbers, and deeply nested logic.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect code for code smells and anti-patterns, with thresholds taken from a project configuration file when one is available.
Why use it?
It highlights code that may be difficult to understand, test, or change, before those problems make future work slower or riskier.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it to inspect code for code smells and anti-patterns, with thresholds taken from a project configuration file when one is available.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-code-smells
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add nishilbhave/codeprobe --skill codeprobe-code-smells
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nishilbhave/codeprobe

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for codeprobe-code-smells

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-code-smells/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-code-smells)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-code-smells"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-code-smells/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for codeprobe-code-smells

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-code-smells"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-code-smells.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 77 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,614 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00077 $0.02614
Opus 5.5 $0.00031 $0.01046
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00015 $0.00523
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00261

Measured 2mo ago against content hash c39b8a517ad0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

codeprobe-code-smells scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/codeprobe-code-smells/SKILL.md · 119 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 119 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Standalone Mode

If invoked directly (not via the orchestrator), you must first:

  1. Read ../codeprobe/shared-preamble.md (resolve relative to this SKILL.md's location — the sibling codeprobe skill directory — not the user's project) for the output contract, execution modes, and constraints.
  2. Load applicable reference files from ../codeprobe/references/ (same resolution) based on the project's tech stack.
  3. Default to full mode unless the user specifies otherwise.

Code Smells & Anti-Pattern Detector

Domain Scope

This sub-skill detects code smells and anti-patterns organized into these categories:

  1. Bloaters — Long Method, Large Class, Data Clumps, Primitive Obsession
  2. Object-Orientation Abusers — Feature Envy, Inappropriate Intimacy, Refused Bequest
  3. Change Preventers — Shotgun Surgery, Divergent Change
  4. Dispensables — Dead Code, Speculative Generality, Middle Man
  5. Couplers — Temporal Coupling
  6. Readability — Magic Numbers, Boolean Blindness, Deep Nesting

What It Does NOT Flag

  • Generated code — Migrations, compiled output, vendor directories (vendor/, node_modules/, dist/, build/, .next/), and auto-generated files (e.g., GraphQL codegen, Prisma client).
  • Test files with long setup methods — Test context is different; long setUp() or beforeEach() methods arranging test data are expected and acceptable.
  • Configuration files with many entries — A config file with 50 key-value pairs is not a "Large Class" smell.
  • Data migration files — These are procedural by nature and often contain long methods.
  • Third-party code checked into the repository (e.g., vendored libraries).
  • Structural issues already flagged by codeprobe-solid or codeprobe-architecture — Large classes may also be flagged as SRP violations or god objects. This sub-skill should still detect and report them, but the orchestrator will deduplicate overlapping findings at the same location.

Detection Instructions

Read the full file on GitHub · 119 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 119 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A c39b8a517ad0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

codeprobe-code-smells is a skill published in the GitHub repository nishilbhave/codeprobe (5 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 2,614 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

agent-teams-simplify-and-harden

Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills · 115 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens