Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nishilbhave/codeprobe --skill codeprobe-frameworkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nishilbhave/codeprobeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-framework)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-framework"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-framework/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-framework"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-framework.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00095 | $0.02307 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00923 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00461 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00231 |
Grade A, and why
codeprobe-framework scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 113 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Standalone Mode
If invoked directly (not via the orchestrator), you must first:
- Read
../codeprobe/shared-preamble.md(resolve relative to this SKILL.md's location — the siblingcodeprobeskill directory — not the user's project) for the output contract, execution modes, and constraints. - Load applicable reference files from
../codeprobe/references/(same resolution) based on the project's tech stack. - Default to
fullmode unless the user specifies otherwise.
Framework-Specific Best Practices
Domain Scope
This sub-skill detects framework-specific anti-patterns and convention violations. Unlike other sub-skills that apply universal principles, this one loads framework-specific reference guides and checks against framework idioms.
Supported frameworks:
- PHP / Laravel — Eloquent ORM, routing, validation, queues, events, configuration
- React / Next.js — Component design, hooks, data fetching, type safety
- Python / Django / FastAPI — PEP conventions, ORM patterns, async handling
Important: If no supported framework is detected at the target path, emit zero findings and return an empty summary with a note: "No supported framework detected — skipping framework-specific checks."
Version Awareness: When checking framework conventions, attempt to determine the framework version:
- Laravel: check
composer.jsonforlaravel/frameworkversion. Laravel 9+ uses attribute-based accessors instead ofgetXAttribute(). - Next.js: check
next.config.*andpackage.jsonfor Next.js version. 13+ uses App Router withapp/directory. - Django: check
requirements.txtorsetup.pyfor Django version.
What It Does NOT Flag
- Issues already covered by other sub-skills even if they appear in framework code. Specifically:
- Security issues in framework code → covered by
codeprobe-security(SEC) - SOLID violations in framework classes → covered by
codeprobe-solid(SRP/OCP/etc.) - Performance issues like N+1 queries → covered by
codeprobe-performance(PERF) - Error handling in framework middleware → covered by
codeprobe-error-handling(ERR)
- Security issues in framework code → covered by
- This sub-skill focuses exclusively on framework idiom violations — using the framework incorrectly or ignoring its conventions.
- When this sub-skill and another sub-skill flag the same file:line range, the orchestrator's deduplication step (Section 7A) will keep the finding in whichever category is most relevant and mark the framework finding as a duplicate.
- Framework-generated boilerplate files (migration stubs, config defaults, scaffolded controllers).
- Intentional deviations from framework conventions with clear comments explaining the reason.
- Test files — test-specific framework usage has different conventions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 113 lines · 95 tokens per session scan A c0c2248b1bf7
codeprobe-framework is a skill published in the GitHub repository nishilbhave/codeprobe (5 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 95 tokens to every session and 2,307 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…