Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-solidnpx skills add nishilbhave/codeprobe --skill codeprobe-solidgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nishilbhave/codeprobeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00071 | $0.01924 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00962 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00385 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00192 |
Grade A, and why
codeprobe-solid scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Standalone Mode
If invoked directly (not via the orchestrator), you must first:
- Read
../codeprobe/shared-preamble.md(resolve relative to this SKILL.md's location — the siblingcodeprobeskill directory — not the user's project) for the output contract, execution modes, and constraints. - Load applicable reference files from
../codeprobe/references/(same resolution) based on the project's tech stack. - Default to
fullmode unless the user specifies otherwise.
SOLID Principles Auditor
Domain Scope
This sub-skill detects violations of the five SOLID principles:
- Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) — A class or module should have only one reason to change.
- Open/Closed Principle (OCP) — Software entities should be open for extension but closed for modification.
- Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP) — Subtypes must be substitutable for their base types without altering program correctness.
- Interface Segregation Principle (ISP) — Clients should not be forced to depend on interfaces they do not use.
- Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP) — High-level modules should not depend on low-level modules; both should depend on abstractions.
What It Does NOT Flag
- Simple DTOs/value objects with multiple fields — having many properties is not an SRP violation when the class represents a single data concept.
- Small scripts and CLIs that don't need dependency injection — proportional design matters.
- Enums used in switches where the enum is stable and closed (e.g., compass directions, days of the week) — OCP applies when variants are likely to grow.
- Framework-generated classes following framework conventions (e.g., Laravel migrations, Django admin classes, Rails ActiveRecord models with standard callbacks).
- Test helper classes that aggregate setup utilities — test infrastructure has different design constraints.
Detection Instructions
SRP — Single Responsibility Principle
| ID Prefix | Signal | How to Detect | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
SRP |
Class has 5+ public methods doing unrelated things | Count public methods. If 5+ exist, check whether they cluster around a single responsibility or span multiple concerns (e.g., authentication + email + database). Look for method name prefixes that suggest different domains. | Major |
SRP |
Method exceeds 30 LOC doing multiple concerns | Count lines in each method (excluding blank lines and comments). If > 30 LOC, check whether the method handles multiple distinct steps (validation, transformation, persistence, notification) that could be extracted. | Minor |
SRP |
Class name is vague | Flag classes named Manager, Handler, Utils, Helper, Processor, Service (when not domain-qualified) — these names suggest the class has no clear single purpose. Exception: if the class is small (< 5 methods, < 100 LOC), downgrade to suggestion. |
Minor |
SRP |
Constructor takes 5+ dependencies | Count constructor parameters or injected dependencies. 5+ dependencies suggest the class has too many responsibilities. Check whether dependencies serve different domains. | Major |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 106 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A df79ad5f38cf
codeprobe-solid is a skill published in the GitHub repository nishilbhave/codeprobe (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 1,924 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…