codeprobe-solid

A code reviewer that checks software against SOLID, five design guidelines for keeping code focused, extensible, substitutable, and loosely connected.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to find violations in classes and methods, review code structure, and generate prompts for addressing the identified problems.
Why use it?
It highlights design problems that can make code harder to change, test, or maintain.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/nishilbhave/codeprobe/codeprobe-solid
Any agent
npx skills add nishilbhave/codeprobe --skill codeprobe-solid
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nishilbhave/codeprobe

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 71 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,924 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00071 $0.01924
Opus 5 $0.00036 $0.00962
Sonnet 5 $0.00014 $0.00385
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00192

Measured 2d ago against content hash df79ad5f38cf, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

codeprobe-solid scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/codeprobe-solid/SKILL.md · 106 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Standalone Mode

If invoked directly (not via the orchestrator), you must first:

  1. Read ../codeprobe/shared-preamble.md (resolve relative to this SKILL.md's location — the sibling codeprobe skill directory — not the user's project) for the output contract, execution modes, and constraints.
  2. Load applicable reference files from ../codeprobe/references/ (same resolution) based on the project's tech stack.
  3. Default to full mode unless the user specifies otherwise.

SOLID Principles Auditor

Domain Scope

This sub-skill detects violations of the five SOLID principles:

  1. Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) — A class or module should have only one reason to change.
  2. Open/Closed Principle (OCP) — Software entities should be open for extension but closed for modification.
  3. Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP) — Subtypes must be substitutable for their base types without altering program correctness.
  4. Interface Segregation Principle (ISP) — Clients should not be forced to depend on interfaces they do not use.
  5. Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP) — High-level modules should not depend on low-level modules; both should depend on abstractions.

What It Does NOT Flag

  • Simple DTOs/value objects with multiple fields — having many properties is not an SRP violation when the class represents a single data concept.
  • Small scripts and CLIs that don't need dependency injection — proportional design matters.
  • Enums used in switches where the enum is stable and closed (e.g., compass directions, days of the week) — OCP applies when variants are likely to grow.
  • Framework-generated classes following framework conventions (e.g., Laravel migrations, Django admin classes, Rails ActiveRecord models with standard callbacks).
  • Test helper classes that aggregate setup utilities — test infrastructure has different design constraints.

Detection Instructions

SRP — Single Responsibility Principle

ID Prefix Signal How to Detect Severity
SRP Class has 5+ public methods doing unrelated things Count public methods. If 5+ exist, check whether they cluster around a single responsibility or span multiple concerns (e.g., authentication + email + database). Look for method name prefixes that suggest different domains. Major
SRP Method exceeds 30 LOC doing multiple concerns Count lines in each method (excluding blank lines and comments). If > 30 LOC, check whether the method handles multiple distinct steps (validation, transformation, persistence, notification) that could be extracted. Minor
SRP Class name is vague Flag classes named Manager, Handler, Utils, Helper, Processor, Service (when not domain-qualified) — these names suggest the class has no clear single purpose. Exception: if the class is small (< 5 methods, < 100 LOC), downgrade to suggestion. Minor
SRP Constructor takes 5+ dependencies Count constructor parameters or injected dependencies. 5+ dependencies suggest the class has too many responsibilities. Check whether dependencies serve different domains. Major

Read the full file on GitHub · 106 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 106 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A df79ad5f38cf

Subscribe to this mod's changes

codeprobe-solid is a skill published in the GitHub repository nishilbhave/codeprobe (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 1,924 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens