Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Njones17/AI-agent-master-cyber-skills-list --skill testing-mobile-api-authenticationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Njones17/AI-agent-master-cyber-skills-listWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/njones17/ai-agent-master-cyber-skills-list/testing-mobile-api-authentication)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/njones17/ai-agent-master-cyber-skills-list/testing-mobile-api-authentication"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/njones17/ai-agent-master-cyber-skills-list/testing-mobile-api-authentication/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/njones17/ai-agent-master-cyber-skills-list/testing-mobile-api-authentication"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/njones17/ai-agent-master-cyber-skills-list/testing-mobile-api-authentication.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00084 | $0.01596 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00042 | $0.00798 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00319 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00160 |
Grade A, and why
testing-mobile-api-authentication scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
- Postman or curl for API request crafting The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 185 lines · 84 tokens per session scan A 14f71e7c3119
testing-mobile-api-authentication is a skill published in the GitHub repository Njones17/AI-agent-master-cyber-skills-list (21 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 84 tokens to every session and 1,596 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
testing-mobile-api-authentication
Tests authentication and authorization mechanisms in mobile application APIs to identify broken authentication, insecure token management, session fixation, privilege escalation, and IDOR vulnerabilities. Use when performing API security assessments against mobile app backends, testing JWT implementations, evaluating…
exploiting-insecure-data-storage-in-mobile
Identifies and exploits insecure local data storage vulnerabilities in Android and iOS mobile applications including unencrypted databases, world-readable files, insecure SharedPreferences, plaintext credential storage, and improper keychain/keystore usage. Use when performing mobile penetration testing focused on…
exploiting-deeplink-vulnerabilities
Tests and exploits deep link (URL scheme and App Link) vulnerabilities in Android and iOS mobile applications to identify unauthorized access, data injection, intent hijacking, and redirect manipulation. Use when assessing mobile app attack surface through custom URI schemes, Android App Links, iOS Universal Links, or…
analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection
Runtime iOS app security testing with Objection (Frida): inspect keychain and filesystem data, explore app internals at runtime, and validate/bypass client-side protections during authorized mobile assessments.
Mobile Application Security
Android and iOS application security testing — static and dynamic analysis, APK/IPA inspection, OWASP MASVS/MASTG verification, secure-storage and transport review, and mobile malware triage for authorized assessments.
analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection
Use when performs runtime mobile security exploration of iOS applications using Objection, a Frida-powered toolkit that enables security testers to interact with app internals without jailbreaking. Use when assessing iOS app security posture, bypassing client-side protections, dumping keychain items, inspecting…