Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add oyi77/1ai-skills --skill analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objectiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oyi77/1ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/oyi77/1ai-skills/analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oyi77/1ai-skills/analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oyi77/1ai-skills/analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oyi77/1ai-skills/analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oyi77/1ai-skills/analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Privilege Escalation · line 6 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00100 | $0.01140 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00050 | $0.00570 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00228 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 130 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Analyzing Ios App Security With Objection
Overview
Cybersecurity skill for analyzing ios app security with objection. Follows industry best practices and security standards.
When to Use
Trigger phrases:
- "analyzing ios app security with objection"
- "Performing runtime security assessment of iOS applications during authorized pen"
- "Inspecting iOS keychain, filesystem, and memory for sensitive data exposure"
- "Bypassing client-side security controls (SSL pinning, jailbreak detection) durin"
Use this skill when:
- Performing runtime security assessment of iOS applications during authorized penetration tests
- Inspecting iOS keychain, filesystem, and memory for sensitive data exposure
- Bypassing client-side security controls (SSL pinning, jailbreak detection) during security testing
- Evaluating iOS app behavior at runtime without access to source code
Do not use this skill on production devices without explicit authorization -- Objection modifies app runtime behavior and may trigger security monitoring.
When NOT to Use
- When you lack proper authorization for testing
- For production systems without change management
- When the task requires legal or compliance expertise beyond technical scope
Prerequisites
- Python 3.10+ with pip
- Objection installed:
pip install objection - Frida installed:
pip install frida-tools - Target iOS device (jailbroken with Frida server, or non-jailbroken with repackaged IPA)
- For non-jailbroken:
objection patchipato inject Frida gadget into IPA - macOS recommended for iOS testing (Xcode, ideviceinstaller)
- USB connection to target device or network Frida server
Workflow
# Example: IOC detection
import re
IOC_PATTERNS = {
"ip": r"\b(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}\b",
"domain": r"\b[a-z0-9-]+\.[a-z]{2,}\b",
"hash_md5": r"\b[a-f0-9]{32}\b",
"hash_sha256": r"\b[a-f0-9]{64}\b",
}
def extract_iocs(text: str) -> dict:
return {k: re.findall(v, text) for k, v in IOC_PATTERNS.items()}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 130 lines · 100 tokens per session scan A 7bc25c9ae23f
analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection is a skill published in the GitHub repository oyi77/1ai-skills (12 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 1,140 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection
Runtime iOS app security testing with Objection (Frida): inspect keychain and filesystem data, explore app internals at runtime, and validate/bypass client-side protections during authorized mobile assessments.
analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection
Performs runtime mobile security exploration of iOS applications using Objection, a Frida-powered toolkit that enables security testers to interact with app internals without jailbreaking. Use when assessing iOS app security posture, bypassing client-side protections, dumping keychain items, inspecting filesystem…
analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection
Performs runtime mobile security exploration of iOS applications using Objection, a Frida-powered toolkit that enables security testers to interact with app internals without jailbreaking. Use when assessing iOS app security posture, bypassing client-side protections, dumping keychain items, inspecting filesystem…
analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection
Runtime iOS app security testing with Objection (Frida): inspect keychain and filesystem data, explore app internals at runtime, and validate/bypass client-side protections during authorized mobile assessments.
analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection
Performs runtime mobile security exploration of iOS applications using Objection, a Frida-powered toolkit that enables security testers to interact with app internals without jailbreaking. Use when assessing iOS app security posture, bypassing client-side protections, dumping keychain items, inspecting filesystem…
analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection
A security-testing guide for Objection, a tool that lets testers inspect and interact with an iOS app while it is running. It uses Frida and can work with jailbroken devices or specially prepared app packages.