Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nklofy/code-agent-skills --skill llm-trading-agent-securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nklofy/code-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nklofy/code-agent-skills/llm-trading-agent-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nklofy/code-agent-skills/llm-trading-agent-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nklofy/code-agent-skills/llm-trading-agent-security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nklofy/code-agent-skills/llm-trading-agent-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nklofy/code-agent-skills/llm-trading-agent-security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01086 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00543 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00217 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
llm-trading-agent-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to llm-trading-agent-security — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 148 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LLM Trading Agent Security
Autonomous trading agents have a harsher threat model than normal LLM apps: an injection or bad tool path can turn directly into asset loss.
When to Use
- Building an AI agent that signs and sends transactions
- Auditing a trading bot or on-chain execution assistant
- Designing wallet key management for an agent
- Giving an LLM access to order placement, swaps, or treasury operations
How It Works
Layer the defenses. No single check is enough. Treat prompt hygiene, spend policy, simulation, execution limits, and wallet isolation as independent controls.
Examples
Treat prompt injection as a financial attack
import re
INJECTION_PATTERNS = [
r'ignore (previous|all) instructions',
r'new (task|directive|instruction)',
r'system prompt',
r'send .{0,50} to 0x[0-9a-fA-F]{40}',
r'transfer .{0,50} to',
r'approve .{0,50} for',
]
def sanitize_onchain_data(text: str) -> str:
for pattern in INJECTION_PATTERNS:
if re.search(pattern, text, re.IGNORECASE):
raise ValueError(f"Potential prompt injection: {text[:100]}")
return text
Do not blindly inject token names, pair labels, webhooks, or social feeds into an execution-capable prompt.
Hard spend limits
from decimal import Decimal
MAX_SINGLE_TX_USD = Decimal("500")
MAX_DAILY_SPEND_USD = Decimal("2000")
class SpendLimitError(Exception):
pass
class SpendLimitGuard:
def check_and_record(self, usd_amount: Decimal) -> None:
if usd_amount > MAX_SINGLE_TX_USD:
raise SpendLimitError(f"Single tx ${usd_amount} exceeds max ${MAX_SINGLE_TX_USD}")
daily = self._get_24h_spend()
if daily + usd_amount > MAX_DAILY_SPEND_USD:
raise SpendLimitError(f"Daily limit: ${daily} + ${usd_amount} > ${MAX_DAILY_SPEND_USD}")
self._record_spend(usd_amount)
Simulate before sending
class SlippageError(Exception):
pass
async def safe_execute(self, tx: dict, expected_min_out: int | None = None) -> str:
sim_result = await self.w3.eth.call(tx)
if expected_min_out is None:
raise ValueError("min_amount_out is required before send")
actual_out = decode_uint256(sim_result)
if actual_out < expected_min_out:
raise SlippageError(f"Simulation: {actual_out} < {expected_min_out}")
signed = self.account.sign_transaction(tx)
return await self.w3.eth.send_raw_transaction(signed.raw_transaction)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 148 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 7e78ba37dddd
llm-trading-agent-security is a skill published in the GitHub repository nklofy/code-agent-skills (18 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,086 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to llm-trading-agent-security, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
sector-rotation
An analysis framework for comparing industries in the Chinese A-share stock market, using business conditions, price momentum, valuation, and money flows. It produces rankings and higher- or lower-allocation suggestions.
strategy-pivot-designer
Detect backtest iteration stagnation and generate structurally different strategy pivot proposals when parameter tuning reaches a local optimum.
twitter-reader
Read Twitter/X for financial research using opencli (read-only). Use this skill whenever the user wants to read their Twitter feed, search for financial tweets, view bookmarks, look up user profiles, or gather market sentiment from Twitter/X. Triggers include: "check my feed", "search Twitter for", "show my…
chenhao-limit-up
A framework for judging Chinese A-share stocks that have reached the daily price-rise limit, using market mood, sector leadership, and trading momentum.
trading-risk-gate
Unified pre-trade safety gate: Ruin check (Law #1), ergodicity audit, and win-rate dominance validation. Absorbs: ergodicity-check, law-of-ruin, win-rate-dominance.
vectorbt
High-performance vectorized backtesting with parameter optimization, portfolio simulation, and rich performance metrics.