Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Jamkris/everything-gemini-code --skill llm-trading-agent-securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jamkris/everything-gemini-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/llm-trading-agent-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/llm-trading-agent-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/llm-trading-agent-security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/llm-trading-agent-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/llm-trading-agent-security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01083 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00541 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00217 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
llm-trading-agent-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- llm-trading-agent-security — 97% identical, 3 lines differ
- llm-trading-agent-security — 95% identical, 2 lines differ
- llm-trading-agent-security — 88% identical, 7 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 147 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LLM Trading Agent Security
Autonomous trading agents have a harsher threat model than normal LLM apps: an injection or bad tool path can turn directly into asset loss.
When to Use
- Building an AI agent that signs and sends transactions
- Auditing a trading bot or on-chain execution assistant
- Designing wallet key management for an agent
- Giving an LLM access to order placement, swaps, or treasury operations
How It Works
Layer the defenses. No single check is enough. Treat prompt hygiene, spend policy, simulation, execution limits, and wallet isolation as independent controls.
Examples
Treat prompt injection as a financial attack
import re
INJECTION_PATTERNS = [
r'ignore (previous|all) instructions',
r'new (task|directive|instruction)',
r'system prompt',
r'send .{0,50} to 0x[0-9a-fA-F]{40}',
r'transfer .{0,50} to',
r'approve .{0,50} for',
]
def sanitize_onchain_data(text: str) -> str:
for pattern in INJECTION_PATTERNS:
if re.search(pattern, text, re.IGNORECASE):
raise ValueError(f"Potential prompt injection: {text[:100]}")
return text
Do not blindly inject token names, pair labels, webhooks, or social feeds into an execution-capable prompt.
Hard spend limits
from decimal import Decimal
MAX_SINGLE_TX_USD = Decimal("500")
MAX_DAILY_SPEND_USD = Decimal("2000")
class SpendLimitError(Exception):
pass
class SpendLimitGuard:
def check_and_record(self, usd_amount: Decimal) -> None:
if usd_amount > MAX_SINGLE_TX_USD:
raise SpendLimitError(f"Single tx ${usd_amount} exceeds max ${MAX_SINGLE_TX_USD}")
daily = self._get_24h_spend()
if daily + usd_amount > MAX_DAILY_SPEND_USD:
raise SpendLimitError(f"Daily limit: ${daily} + ${usd_amount} > ${MAX_DAILY_SPEND_USD}")
self._record_spend(usd_amount)
Simulate before sending
class SlippageError(Exception):
pass
async def safe_execute(self, tx: dict, expected_min_out: int | None = None) -> str:
sim_result = await self.w3.eth.call(tx)
if expected_min_out is None:
raise ValueError("min_amount_out is required before send")
actual_out = decode_uint256(sim_result)
if actual_out < expected_min_out:
raise SlippageError(f"Simulation: {actual_out} < {expected_min_out}")
signed = self.account.sign_transaction(tx)
return await self.w3.eth.send_raw_transaction(signed.raw_transaction)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 147 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 509477236036
llm-trading-agent-security is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jamkris/everything-gemini-code (88 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,083 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
post-quantum-crypto-migrator
FinTech future-proofing. Scans and migrates classical encryption to NIST-approved Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) / Migrasi ke Kriptografi Pasca-Kuantum (PQC) yang disetujui NIST untuk sistem FinTech.
codeck
Route explicit requests from a host coding agent to one or more locally configured AI executors through Codeck, attach Markdown or other project files, moderate cross-model consultation, expose disagreements, and synthesize traceable results. Use when the user explicitly names Codeck or asks to consult, compare, or…
scan
Scan your AI coding tool ecosystem — Gemini CLI, Claude Code, Antigravity (Desktop, CLI, IDE), Continue, Windsurf, JetBrains AI, OpenCode. Produces a maturity score, advisory recommendations, and optionally generates reusable SKILL.md files from your conversation patterns. Use when the user asks to audit their…
review-work
Post-implementation review orchestrator. Launches 5 parallel background sub-agents: Oracle (goal/constraint verification), Oracle (code quality), Oracle (security), unspecified-high (hands-on QA execution), unspecified-high (context mining from GitHub/git/Slack/Notion). All must pass for review to pass. MUST USE after…
image-prompt
A Korean-language skill that turns a rough image idea into a detailed prompt for gpt-image-2, OpenAI’s image-generation model.
archify
Create polished, validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle/state diagrams as explorable standalone HTML with inline SVG, dark/light themes, optional trace motion, and PNG/JPEG/WebP/SVG/WebM export. Accept plain-language requirements or pasted Mermaid flowchart, sequenceDiagram, and…