Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ronmkr/PromptBook --skill llm-trading-agent-securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ronmkr/PromptBookWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/llm-trading-agent-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/llm-trading-agent-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/llm-trading-agent-security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/llm-trading-agent-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/llm-trading-agent-security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01084 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00542 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00217 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
llm-trading-agent-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to llm-trading-agent-security — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 147 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LLM Trading Agent Security
Autonomous trading agents have a harsher threat model than normal LLM apps: an injection or bad tool path can turn directly into asset loss.
When to Use
- Building an AI agent that signs and sends transactions
- Auditing a trading bot or on-chain execution assistant
- Designing wallet key management for an agent
- Giving an LLM access to order placement, swaps, or treasury operations
How It Works
Layer the defenses. No single check is enough. Treat prompt hygiene, spend policy, simulation, execution limits, and wallet isolation as independent controls.
Examples
Treat prompt injection as a financial attack
import re
INJECTION_PATTERNS = [
r'ignore (previous|all) instructions',
r'new (task|directive|instruction)',
r'system prompt',
r'send .{0,50} to 0x[0-9a-fA-F]{40}',
r'transfer .{0,50} to',
r'approve .{0,50} for',
]
def sanitize_onchain_data(text: str) -> str:
for pattern in INJECTION_PATTERNS:
if re.search(pattern, text, re.IGNORECASE):
raise ValueError(f"Potential prompt injection: {text[:100]}")
return text
Do not blindly inject token names, pair labels, webhooks, or social feeds into an execution-capable prompt.
Hard spend limits
from decimal import Decimal
MAX_SINGLE_TX_USD = Decimal("500")
MAX_DAILY_SPEND_USD = Decimal("2000")
class SpendLimitError(Exception):
pass
class SpendLimitGuard:
def check_and_record(self, usd_amount: Decimal) -> None:
if usd_amount > MAX_SINGLE_TX_USD:
raise SpendLimitError(f"Single tx ${usd_amount} exceeds max ${MAX_SINGLE_TX_USD}")
daily = self._get_24h_spend()
if daily + usd_amount > MAX_DAILY_SPEND_USD:
raise SpendLimitError(f"Daily limit: ${daily} + ${usd_amount} > ${MAX_DAILY_SPEND_USD}")
self._record_spend(usd_amount)
Simulate before sending
class SlippageError(Exception):
pass
async def safe_execute(self, tx: dict, expected_min_out: int | None = None) -> str:
sim_result = await self.w3.eth.call(tx)
if expected_min_out is None:
raise ValueError("min_amount_out is required before send")
actual_out = decode_uint256(sim_result)
if actual_out < expected_min_out:
raise SlippageError(f"Simulation: {actual_out} < {expected_min_out}")
signed = self.account.sign_transaction(tx)
return await self.w3.eth.send_raw_transaction(signed.raw_transaction)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 147 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 0893977cc802
llm-trading-agent-security is a skill published in the GitHub repository ronmkr/PromptBook (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,084 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to llm-trading-agent-security, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
fred-economic-data
Query FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data) API for 800,000+ economic time series from 100+ sources. Access GDP, unemployment, inflation, interest rates, exchange rates, housing, and regional data. Use for macroeconomic analysis, financial research, policy studies, economic forecasting, and academic research requiring…
tinker-training-cost
Calculates training costs for Tinker fine-tuning jobs. Use when estimating costs for Tinker LLM training, counting tokens in datasets, or comparing Tinker model training prices. Tokenizes datasets using the correct model tokenizer and provides accurate cost estimates.
receipts-to-expenses
Read a batch of receipt images directly via vision, classify each into expense categories, optionally reconcile against a bank statement CSV, and produce a multi-sheet Excel workbook + a PDF summary. Use when given receipt photos and asked for an expense report.
arkcli-billing
A billing lookup tool for Volcengine ARK, a cloud service for running AI models. It shows settled charges and token-based costs by month, endpoint, API key, or product.
browser-use
Automates browser interactions for web testing, form filling, screenshots, and data extraction. Use when the user needs to navigate websites, interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, or extract information from web pages.
pi-autoresearch-loop
Skill "pi-autoresearch-loop" from twaldin/flt, covering pi-autoresearch — autonomous experiment loop, installation, quick start, core concepts and two-file persistence model.