Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add NOMARJ/sigil --skill hybrid-search-implementationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NOMARJ/sigilWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nomarj/sigil/hybrid-search-implementation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nomarj/sigil/hybrid-search-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nomarj/sigil/hybrid-search-implementation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nomarj/sigil/hybrid-search-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nomarj/sigil/hybrid-search-implementation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.03830 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.01915 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00766 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00383 |
Grade A, and why
hybrid-search-implementation scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
results = await conn.fetch(f""" This is a copy
83% identical to hybrid-search-implementation — 518 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 571 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Hybrid Search Implementation
Patterns for combining vector similarity and keyword-based search.
When to Use This Skill
- Building RAG systems with improved recall
- Combining semantic understanding with exact matching
- Handling queries with specific terms (names, codes)
- Improving search for domain-specific vocabulary
- When pure vector search misses keyword matches
Core Concepts
1. Hybrid Search Architecture
Query → ┬─► Vector Search ──► Candidates ─┐
│ │
└─► Keyword Search ─► Candidates ─┴─► Fusion ─► Results
2. Fusion Methods
| Method | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| RRF | Reciprocal Rank Fusion | General purpose |
| Linear | Weighted sum of scores | Tunable balance |
| Cross-encoder | Rerank with neural model | Highest quality |
| Cascade | Filter then rerank | Efficiency |
Templates
Template 1: Reciprocal Rank Fusion
from typing import List, Dict, Tuple
from collections import defaultdict
def reciprocal_rank_fusion(
result_lists: List[List[Tuple[str, float]]],
k: int = 60,
weights: List[float] = None
) -> List[Tuple[str, float]]:
"""
Combine multiple ranked lists using RRF.
Args:
result_lists: List of (doc_id, score) tuples per search method
k: RRF constant (higher = more weight to lower ranks)
weights: Optional weights per result list
Returns:
Fused ranking as (doc_id, score) tuples
"""
if weights is None:
weights = [1.0] * len(result_lists)
scores = defaultdict(float)
for result_list, weight in zip(result_lists, weights):
for rank, (doc_id, _) in enumerate(result_list):
# RRF formula: 1 / (k + rank)
scores[doc_id] += weight * (1.0 / (k + rank + 1))
# Sort by fused score
return sorted(scores.items(), key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)
def linear_combination(
vector_results: List[Tuple[str, float]],
keyword_results: List[Tuple[str, float]],
alpha: float = 0.5
) -> List[Tuple[str, float]]:
"""
Combine results with linear interpolation.
Args:
vector_results: (doc_id, similarity_score) from vector search
keyword_results: (doc_id, bm25_score) from keyword search
alpha: Weight for vector search (1-alpha for keyword)
"""
# Normalize scores to [0, 1]
def normalize(results):
if not results:
return {}
scores = [s for _, s in results]
min_s, max_s = min(scores), max(scores)
range_s = max_s - min_s if max_s != min_s else 1
return {doc_id: (score - min_s) / range_s for doc_id, score in results}
vector_scores = normalize(vector_results)
keyword_scores = normalize(keyword_results)
# Combine
all_docs = set(vector_scores.keys()) | set(keyword_scores.keys())
combined = {}
for doc_id in all_docs:
v_score = vector_scores.get(doc_id, 0)
k_score = keyword_scores.get(doc_id, 0)
combined[doc_id] = alpha * v_score + (1 - alpha) * k_score
return sorted(combined.items(), key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 571 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 082542a7eb3c
hybrid-search-implementation is a skill published in the GitHub repository NOMARJ/sigil (5 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 3,830 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 83% identical to hybrid-search-implementation, differing in 518 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
amazon-bedrock
Builds generative AI applications on Amazon Bedrock. Covers model invocation (Converse API, InvokeModel), RAG with Knowledge Bases, Bedrock Agents, Guardrails, and AgentCore. Use when invoking models, setting up Knowledge Bases, creating agents, applying guardrails, deploying to AgentCore, troubleshooting Bedrock…
azure-ai-contentunderstanding-py
Azure AI Content Understanding SDK for Python. Use for multimodal content extraction from documents, images, audio, and video.
ai-ml
AI and machine learning workflow covering LLM application development, RAG implementation, agent architecture, ML pipelines, and AI-powered features.
ai-engineer
Build production-ready LLM applications, advanced RAG systems, and intelligent agents. Implements vector search, multimodal AI, agent orchestration, and enterprise AI integrations.
ai-product
Every product will be AI-powered. The question is whether you'll build it right or ship a demo that falls apart in production.
embeddings
Vector embeddings with HNSW indexing, sql.js persistence, and hyperbolic support. 75x faster with agentic-flow integration. Use when: semantic search, pattern matching, similarity queries, knowledge retrieval. Skip when: exact text matching, simple lookups, no semantic understanding needed.