slo-implementation

slo-implementation is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from NOMARJ/sigil. It costs 47 tokens per session (2,144 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of slo-implementation, Apache-2.0.

A guide to measuring and managing the reliability of software services using Service Level Indicators, Service Level Objectives, and error budgets. An SLI is a measured result, an SLO is a target for that result, and an error budget is the allowed amount of failure.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to define availability and latency measurements, set reliability targets, create error budgets, configure alerts, and track service reliability.
Why use it?
It turns vague reliability expectations into measurable targets and helps teams decide when to focus on stability or new development.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to define availability and latency measurements, set reliability targets, create error budgets, configure alerts, and track service reliability.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/nomarj/sigil/slo-implementation
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add NOMARJ/sigil --skill slo-implementation
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NOMARJ/sigil

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for slo-implementation

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nomarj/sigil/slo-implementation/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nomarj/sigil/slo-implementation)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nomarj/sigil/slo-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nomarj/sigil/slo-implementation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for slo-implementation

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nomarj/sigil/slo-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nomarj/sigil/slo-implementation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 47 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,144 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00047 $0.02144
Opus 5.5 $0.00019 $0.00858
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00429
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00214

Measured 1mo ago against content hash f61e9a16339d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

slo-implementation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to slo-implementation — 21 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

packs/infra/skills/observability/slo-implementation/SKILL.md · 339 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 339 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

SLO Implementation

Framework for defining and implementing Service Level Indicators (SLIs), Service Level Objectives (SLOs), and error budgets.

Purpose

Implement measurable reliability targets using SLIs, SLOs, and error budgets to balance reliability with innovation velocity.

When to Use

  • Define service reliability targets
  • Measure user-perceived reliability
  • Implement error budgets
  • Create SLO-based alerts
  • Track reliability goals

SLI/SLO/SLA Hierarchy

SLA (Service Level Agreement)
  ↓ Contract with customers
SLO (Service Level Objective)
  ↓ Internal reliability target
SLI (Service Level Indicator)
  ↓ Actual measurement

Defining SLIs

Common SLI Types

1. Availability SLI
# Successful requests / Total requests
sum(rate(http_requests_total{status!~"5.."}[28d]))
/
sum(rate(http_requests_total[28d]))
2. Latency SLI
# Requests below latency threshold / Total requests
sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{le="0.5"}[28d]))
/
sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_count[28d]))
3. Durability SLI
# Successful writes / Total writes
sum(storage_writes_successful_total)
/
sum(storage_writes_total)

Reference: See references/slo-definitions.md

Setting SLO Targets

Availability SLO Examples

SLO % Downtime/Month Downtime/Year
99% 7.2 hours 3.65 days
99.9% 43.2 minutes 8.76 hours
99.95% 21.6 minutes 4.38 hours
99.99% 4.32 minutes 52.56 minutes

Choose Appropriate SLOs

Consider:

  • User expectations
  • Business requirements
  • Current performance
  • Cost of reliability
  • Competitor benchmarks

Example SLOs:

slos:
  - name: api_availability
    target: 99.9
    window: 28d
    sli: |
      sum(rate(http_requests_total{status!~"5.."}[28d]))
      /
      sum(rate(http_requests_total[28d]))

  - name: api_latency_p95
    target: 99
    window: 28d
    sli: |
      sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{le="0.5"}[28d]))
      /
      sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_count[28d]))

Read the full file on GitHub · 339 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 339 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A f61e9a16339d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

slo-implementation is a skill published in the GitHub repository NOMARJ/sigil (6 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 2,144 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to slo-implementation, differing in 21 lines, and is treated as a copy.