Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles --skill test-driven-developmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/test-driven-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/test-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/test-driven-development/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/test-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/test-driven-development.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.03747 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.01499 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00749 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00375 |
Grade A, and why
test-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
83% identical to test-driven-development — 7 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 402 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test-Driven Development
Overview
Write a failing test before writing the code that makes it pass. For bug fixes, reproduce the bug with a test before attempting a fix. Tests are proof — "seems right" is not done. A codebase with good tests is an AI agent's superpower; a codebase without tests is a liability.
When to Use
- Implementing any new logic or behavior
- Fixing any bug (the Prove-It Pattern)
- Modifying existing functionality
- Adding edge case handling
- Any change that could break existing behavior
When NOT to use: Pure configuration changes, documentation updates, or static content changes that have no behavioral impact.
Related: For browser-based changes, combine TDD with runtime verification using Chrome DevTools MCP — see the Browser Testing section below.
Discover the Stack First
The TDD cycle is universal; the commands are not. Before writing the first test, discover how this repository tests, and use its commands for every RED, GREEN, and verification step:
- Language and build system —
package.json,pom.xml/build.gradle,pyproject.toml,go.mod,Cargo.toml,Gemfile, aMakefile - Checked-in wrappers — prefer
./gradlew,./mvnw,make test, or a repo script over globally installed tools - Test framework and configuration — and how it runs a single focused test vs the full suite
- Existing conventions — where tests live, how files are named, what patterns neighboring tests follow
- Documented commands — README, CONTRIBUTING, and CI workflows show the commands that actually gate merges
Run the repository's focused-test command during the loop and its full-suite command before completion. Never assume a default like npm test — a Gradle, Cargo, or pytest project has its own equivalent.
The examples below use TypeScript for illustration; the workflow is identical in any language once you've discovered the project's own tooling.
The TDD Cycle
RED GREEN REFACTOR
Write a test Write minimal code Clean up the
that fails ──→ to make it pass ──→ implementation ──→ (repeat)
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
Test FAILS Test PASSES Tests still PASS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +19 lines · +7 tokens per session 35224e6a6c09
- 1mo ago First seen · 383 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 948036bf3d41
test-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles (93 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 3,747 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 83% identical to test-driven-development, differing in 7 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
conductor-implement
Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan following TDD workflow.
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Assert what the code's users can observe, so that the test fails when that behavior breaks and keeps passing when only the internals change.
python
Python development with ruff, mypy, pytest - TDD and type safety.
etl-stabilization
Phase-based orchestrator for fixing SnowConvert ETL conversion gaps in ETL-to-Snowflake migrations (SSIS, Informatica, and other platforms). Analyzes units holistically, creates a ROADMAP with test strategies, and executes fixes through phased TDD with cross-phase learning. Use when user says "fix ETL unit", "fix SSIS…
tdd
Drive a change through a red-green-refactor loop - failing test first, minimal code to pass, then clean up. Use when implementing a feature or fixing a bug where correctness matters and a test can pin the behavior. Says "TDD", "test first", "red green refactor", "write the test first".
refactor-code-with-ai
Refactor code with AI assistance. Use to refactor code in TDD loop, and to improve code quality.