Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to novuhq/novu. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/novuhq/novu/next/.cursor/skills/address-pr-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/novuhq/novuWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/novuhq/novu/address-pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/novuhq/novu/address-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/novuhq/novu/address-pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/novuhq/novu/address-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/novuhq/novu/address-pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to low
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- low Excessive Agency · line 116 Skill's behavior or capabilities extend beyond its stated purpose. Scope creep allows an agent to perform actions unrelated to its documented functionality, increasing the attack surface.Fix: Limit the skill's scope to its documented purpose. Remove instructions that enable the agent to perform actions outside its stated functionality.
- low Excessive Agency · line 125 Skill's behavior or capabilities extend beyond its stated purpose. Scope creep allows an agent to perform actions unrelated to its documented functionality, increasing the attack surface.Fix: Limit the skill's scope to its documented purpose. Remove instructions that enable the agent to perform actions outside its stated functionality.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.01829 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00732 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00366 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00183 |
Grade A, and why
address-pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 182 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 2e9a35bcf0ee
address-pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository novuhq/novu (40,220 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 1,829 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cart-abandonment-recovery
Win back shoppers who leave items in their cart by setting up timed email, SMS, and push sequences with escalating incentives to complete their purchase.
Twilio SMS Automation
Automate SMS communications, two-way messaging, notifications, and voice workflows with Twilio.
inbox-triage
Email inbox triage for AI agents — scan, categorize, draft replies, surface urgent items, and archive noise. Supports Gmail and IMAP for inbox zero workflows.
gmail-tool
Gmail integration tool. Performs unread check, body retrieval, and draft creation via Gmail API using OAuth2. Use when: Use when: you need to check received emails, read email bodies, create drafts, search the inbox, or work with labeled emails.
workflows:review
Run multi-agent econometric review on estimation code, identification arguments, and research artifacts.
referee2
Systematic audit and review by Referee 2. Two modes — "deck" reviews slide presentations for rhetoric, visual quality, and compile cleanliness; "code" performs cross-language replication and econometric audit of empirical pipelines. Use when reviewing slides, auditing code, or verifying replication.