novu: Skill for Cursor

.cursor/skills/address-pr-review/SKILL.md

address-pr-review is a skill for Cursor from novuhq/novu. It costs 59 tokens per session (1,829 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A process for reviewing pull-request comments against the stated requirements and the actual code. A pull request is a proposed code change submitted for review.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess and implement valid feedback from pull-request reviews, including comments from CodeRabbit or Bugbot.
Why use it?
It helps separate valid fixes from suggestions that do not apply, reducing unnecessary code changes and replies.

Skill for Cursor

Written for Cursor: installed under .cursor/.

This is novuhq/novu's own configuration. It tells Cursor how to work on novu itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything novu configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to novuhq/novu. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/novuhq/novu/next/.cursor/skills/address-pr-review/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/novuhq/novu

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for address-pr-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/novuhq/novu/address-pr-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/novuhq/novu/address-pr-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/novuhq/novu/address-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/novuhq/novu/address-pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for address-pr-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/novuhq/novu/address-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/novuhq/novu/address-pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 59 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,829 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to low

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • low Excessive Agency · line 116
    Skill's behavior or capabilities extend beyond its stated purpose. Scope creep allows an agent to perform actions unrelated to its documented functionality, increasing the attack surface.
    Fix: Limit the skill's scope to its documented purpose. Remove instructions that enable the agent to perform actions outside its stated functionality.
  • low Excessive Agency · line 125
    Skill's behavior or capabilities extend beyond its stated purpose. Scope creep allows an agent to perform actions unrelated to its documented functionality, increasing the attack surface.
    Fix: Limit the skill's scope to its documented purpose. Remove instructions that enable the agent to perform actions outside its stated functionality.
How audits are shown
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00059 $0.01829
Opus 5 $0.00030 $0.00915
Sonnet 5 $0.00012 $0.00366
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00183

Measured 12d ago against content hash 2e9a35bcf0ee, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

address-pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/skills/address-pr-review/SKILL.md · 182 lines

The source is not reproduced here

A licence we could not identify

The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 182 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 2e9a35bcf0ee

Subscribe to this mod's changes

address-pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository novuhq/novu (39,963 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 1,829 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.