Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to novuhq/novu. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/novuhq/novu/next/.claude/skills/better-auth-best-practices/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/novuhq/novuWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/novuhq/novu/better-auth-best-practices)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/novuhq/novu/better-auth-best-practices"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/novuhq/novu/better-auth-best-practices/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/novuhq/novu/better-auth-best-practices"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/novuhq/novu/better-auth-best-practices.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 26 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 27 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 28 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.01571 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00785 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00314 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00157 |
Grade A, and why
better-auth-best-practices scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 166 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A d67a75a83202
better-auth-best-practices is a skill published in the GitHub repository novuhq/novu (39,969 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 1,571 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Twilio SMS Automation
Automate SMS communications, two-way messaging, notifications, and voice workflows with Twilio.
wraps-workflows
Build email and SMS automation workflows using the @wraps.dev/client TypeScript DSL. Covers triggers, steps, branching, cascades, and the full defineWorkflow API.
resend
Send emails through Resend's official MCP server. Supports single send, batch send, HTML and plain text bodies, attachments, CC/BCC, scheduling, and contact management.
cart-abandonment-recovery
Win back shoppers who leave items in their cart by setting up timed email, SMS, and push sequences with escalating incentives to complete their purchase.
communication-systems
Email, notifications, and messaging system patterns.
inbox-triage
Email inbox triage for AI agents — scan, categorize, draft replies, surface urgent items, and archive noise. Supports Gmail and IMAP for inbox zero workflows.