meta: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/architecture-review/SKILL.md

architecture-review is a skill for Claude Code from Npuls-OKx/meta. It costs 34 tokens per session (1,062 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A review of a codebase's overall health, looking for large combined modules, hidden failures, weak type checks, missing tests, and problems that make the code harder for AI assistants to work with.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess existing code before maintenance, refactoring, or wider development work.
Why use it?
It highlights structural and testing weaknesses that may cause maintenance problems or missed errors.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is Npuls-OKx/meta's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on meta itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything meta configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to Npuls-OKx/meta. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Npuls-OKx/meta/dev/.agents/skills/architecture-review/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Npuls-OKx/meta

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for architecture-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/npuls-okx/meta/architecture-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/npuls-okx/meta/architecture-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/npuls-okx/meta/architecture-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/npuls-okx/meta/architecture-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for architecture-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/npuls-okx/meta/architecture-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/npuls-okx/meta/architecture-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 34 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,062 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00034 $0.01062
Opus 5.5 $0.00014 $0.00425
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00212
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00106

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 1807fdb2ec7d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

architecture-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/architecture-review/SKILL.md · 122 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 122 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 1807fdb2ec7d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

architecture-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Npuls-OKx/meta (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,062 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-06.

Related

architecture-review compared with skills from other repositories

architecture-review next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
architecture-reviewNpuls-OKx/metaSkill2yesterdaynoneA34Claude Code
pull-requestspingdotgg/t3codeSkill48ktodayMITA34Claude Code, Codex
test-reviewdatahub-project/datahubSkill13kyesterdayApache-2.0A0Claude Code, Codex
grade-testsdotnet/skillsSkill5.8kyesterdayMITA119Claude Code
go-testingGentleman-Programming/gentle-aiSkill8.4kyesterdayMITA26Claude Code, Codex
quality-checklista5c-ai/babysitterSkill1.9k5d agoMITA25Claude Code
brooks-testhyhmrright/brooks-lintSkill1.6kyesterdayMITA161Claude Code