ux-ui-design-assessment

ux-ui-design-assessment is a skill for Codex from ntaffzii/Skill-Agents. It costs 220 tokens per session (1,432 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A method for documenting or planning a project’s user experience and visual interface, either by reviewing an existing product or designing a new one.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to create a UX/UI assessment for an existing project or a design document for a new product. It documents and plans the interface rather than implementing code.
Why use it?
It gives a structured way to assess or plan navigation, layout, visual hierarchy, responsive behavior, and usability instead of relying on vague impressions.

Skill for Codex

Written for Codex: agents/openai.yaml present.

Good fit Use it to create a UX/UI assessment for an existing project or a design document for a new product. It documents and plans the interface rather than implementing code.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ntaffzii/skill-agents/ux-ui-design-assessment
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ntaffzii/Skill-Agents --skill ux-ui-design-assessment
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ntaffzii/Skill-Agents

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ux-ui-design-assessment

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ntaffzii/skill-agents/ux-ui-design-assessment/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ntaffzii/skill-agents/ux-ui-design-assessment)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ntaffzii/skill-agents/ux-ui-design-assessment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ntaffzii/skill-agents/ux-ui-design-assessment/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for ux-ui-design-assessment

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ntaffzii/skill-agents/ux-ui-design-assessment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ntaffzii/skill-agents/ux-ui-design-assessment.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 220 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,432 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00220 $0.01432
Opus 5 $0.00110 $0.00716
Sonnet 5 $0.00044 $0.00286
Haiku 4.5 $0.00022 $0.00143

Measured 11d ago against content hash db3c0df5ed6f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ux-ui-design-assessment scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/engineering/ux-ui-design-assessment/SKILL.md · 67 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 67 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

UX/UI Design Assessment

Produce an evidence-based UX/UI document for a project — either by auditing an existing interface or by designing the UX/UI for a new one. The methodology is the ten-topic UX/UI body of knowledge in references/ux-ui-knowledge.md.

This skill documents and plans. It does not implement UI code — that is the job of the companion ui-design-engineering skill.

Choose The Mode

  • Audit mode — evaluate an existing project's interface against the ten UX/UI dimensions; produce a report file describing how the project's UX/UI currently is.
  • Design mode — design the UX/UI for a new (or redesigned) product; produce a design document.

If unsure, ask the user one question: "Is there an existing interface to evaluate (Audit), or are we designing UX/UI for something new (Design)?"

Knowledge Base (read on demand)

  • references/ux-ui-knowledge.md — the ten topics: UX/UI foundations, Design Thinking, user research (persona/empathy map/affinity), information architecture, wireframe/mockup/prototype, visual hierarchy, color and typography, responsive design, moodboard, usability testing.
  • references/audit-rubric.md — Audit mode: ten-dimension rubric, severity scale, evidence rules.
  • references/design-workflow.md — Design mode: the 7-step loop and sub-templates (persona card, empathy map, problem statement, user flow, wireframe checklist, moodboard).
  • references/external-techniques.md and references/credits.md — what was adapted from external skills (design-lab, ui-ux-pro-max, improve-ui, rams, web-design-guidelines).

Audit Mode Workflow

  1. Inspect the project — read the framework, routes, components, design tokens, and any DESIGN.md. Open the real pages in a browser when possible.
  2. Identify user and task — name the primary user, their immediate goal, the environment, and how often the workflow runs.
  3. Evaluate against the ten dimensions — for each, find evidence and apply the rubric. Never guess; every candidate must pass the three-part proof gate (contract + runtime + correction) and survive falsification.
  4. Rate and prioritize — assign a rating (Strong/Adequate/Weak/Missing/N/A) and a severity (P0-P3) to each finding. If nothing survives falsification for a dimension, write "No supported findings".
  5. Write the report — fill templates/UX-UI-ASSESSMENT.md: overall summary, dimension table, findings by severity, responsive/accessibility/usability sections, prioritized fix list.

Read the full file on GitHub · 67 lines

Files

What ships with it

8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 67 lines · 220 tokens per session scan A db3c0df5ed6f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ux-ui-design-assessment is a skill published in the GitHub repository ntaffzii/Skill-Agents (4 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 220 tokens to every session and 1,432 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.