Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/nth5693/gemini-kit/compound-docsnpx skills add nth5693/gemini-kit --skill compound-docsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nth5693/gemini-kitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00744 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00372 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
compound-docs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- compound-docs — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 134 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Compound Documentation Skill
Manages solution documentation in docs/solutions/ for knowledge persistence across sessions.
Overview
When you solve a problem, document it so the solution can be found and reused later.
What do you want to do?
- Document a solution → Use
/compoundworkflow - Find existing solutions → See "Searching Solutions" below
- Promote to pattern → See "Pattern Promotion" below
- Validate schema → See "YAML Validation" below
Instrumentation
# Log usage when using this skill
./scripts/log-skill.sh "compound-docs" "manual" "$$"
Searching Solutions
# Search by keyword
grep -r "keyword" docs/solutions/
# Search by tag
grep -l "tags:.*performance" docs/solutions/**/*.md
# Search by problem type
ls docs/solutions/performance-issues/
Pattern Promotion
When an issue occurs 3+ times:
-
Search for similar solutions:
grep -r "similar terms" docs/solutions/ -
Add to critical patterns:
# Edit docs/solutions/patterns/critical-patterns.md -
Format:
### Pattern #{N}: {Name} **Problem:** {What goes wrong} **❌ WRONG:** ```code {incorrect}✅ CORRECT:
{correct}
YAML Validation
All solutions must have valid frontmatter:
---
date: "YYYY-MM-DD"
problem_type: "{from schema.yaml}"
severity: "critical|high|medium|low"
symptoms:
- "symptom 1"
root_cause: "{from schema.yaml}"
tags:
- tag1
---
See docs/solutions/schema.yaml for valid enum values.
Documenting Failures & Learnings
When documenting solutions, capture the full journey:
What to Include
- ✅ Failed attempts with explanations
- ✅ Incorrect assumptions and corrections
- ✅ Key insights from mistakes
- ✅ Course corrections and why
- ✅ Time investment (helps prioritize future similar issues)
Example Pattern
## Investigation Steps
| Attempt | Hypothesis | Result |
|---------|------------|--------|
| 1. Check API logs | API might be timing out | ❌ No timeouts found |
| 2. Review database queries | N+1 query suspected | ❌ Queries were optimized |
| 3. Check cache invalidation | Cache might be stale | ✅ Found cache not clearing |
## Lessons Learned
### Mistakes Made
- **Assumption:** Assumed the API was the bottleneck
- **Why wrong:** Didn't check cache layer first
- **Correction:** Should always check cache before API
### Key Breakthrough
- **Insight:** Realized cache invalidation logic was only running on UPDATE, not DELETE
- **Impact:** Led directly to the solution
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 134 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 1c3b6401c330
compound-docs is a skill published in the GitHub repository nth5693/gemini-kit (375 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 744 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
triage-issue
Investigate a reported bug to root cause, then emit a TDD-shaped fix plan as an issue artifact. Trigger when the user reports a bug, says "triage", asks for issue investigation, or wants a fix plan before code changes.
minimalist-general
Subtraction-first thinking for non-coding tasks: writing, planning, research, summarizing, decision-making, or any request that isn't producing code. Same discipline as the minimalist coding skill — question whether the ask is even needed, reuse what already exists, do the smallest thing that fully answers it …
minimalist
Subtraction-first engineering for any coding task. Use when writing, fixing, refactoring, reviewing, or designing code; when choosing dependencies; or whenever the user asks for minimalist, less code, simplest thing, YAGNI, or complains about bloat. Prefer deletion, existing code, stdlib, and native platform features…
minimalist-audit
Audit a codebase or directory for deletion candidates: dead code, unused dependencies, single-use abstractions, config that never varies, and duplicated helpers. Use when the user says "minimalist audit" or asks what can be deleted from a project.
minimalist-gain
Report what minimalist actually measured in this session or project — LOC avoided, scope rejected, dependencies declined. Use when the user says "minimalist gain", "what did you save", or asks for the savings report.
minimalist-review
Review code, a diff, or a PR strictly for bloat: unrequested abstractions, dead scope, dependency creep, symptom-patching, and drive-by changes. Use when the user says "minimalist review", asks "is this over-engineered?", or wants a leanness review of a change.