Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/salavender/antigravity-compound-engineering-plugin/compound-docsnpx skills add salavender/antigravity-compound-engineering-plugin --skill compound-docsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/salavender/antigravity-compound-engineering-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/salavender/antigravity-compound-engineering-plugin/compound-docs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/salavender/antigravity-compound-engineering-plugin/compound-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/salavender/antigravity-compound-engineering-plugin/compound-docs.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00744 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00372 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
compound-docs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to compound-docs — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 134 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Compound Documentation Skill
Manages solution documentation in docs/solutions/ for knowledge persistence across sessions.
Overview
When you solve a problem, document it so the solution can be found and reused later.
What do you want to do?
- Document a solution → Use
/compoundworkflow - Find existing solutions → See "Searching Solutions" below
- Promote to pattern → See "Pattern Promotion" below
- Validate schema → See "YAML Validation" below
Instrumentation
# Log usage when using this skill
./scripts/log-skill.sh "compound-docs" "manual" "$$"
Searching Solutions
# Search by keyword
grep -r "keyword" docs/solutions/
# Search by tag
grep -l "tags:.*performance" docs/solutions/**/*.md
# Search by problem type
ls docs/solutions/performance-issues/
Pattern Promotion
When an issue occurs 3+ times:
-
Search for similar solutions:
grep -r "similar terms" docs/solutions/ -
Add to critical patterns:
# Edit docs/solutions/patterns/critical-patterns.md -
Format:
### Pattern #{N}: {Name} **Problem:** {What goes wrong} **❌ WRONG:** ```code {incorrect}✅ CORRECT:
{correct}
YAML Validation
All solutions must have valid frontmatter:
---
date: "YYYY-MM-DD"
problem_type: "{from schema.yaml}"
severity: "critical|high|medium|low"
symptoms:
- "symptom 1"
root_cause: "{from schema.yaml}"
tags:
- tag1
---
See docs/solutions/schema.yaml for valid enum values.
Documenting Failures & Learnings
When documenting solutions, capture the full journey:
What to Include
- ✅ Failed attempts with explanations
- ✅ Incorrect assumptions and corrections
- ✅ Key insights from mistakes
- ✅ Course corrections and why
- ✅ Time investment (helps prioritize future similar issues)
Example Pattern
## Investigation Steps
| Attempt | Hypothesis | Result |
|---------|------------|--------|
| 1. Check API logs | API might be timing out | ❌ No timeouts found |
| 2. Review database queries | N+1 query suspected | ❌ Queries were optimized |
| 3. Check cache invalidation | Cache might be stale | ✅ Found cache not clearing |
## Lessons Learned
### Mistakes Made
- **Assumption:** Assumed the API was the bottleneck
- **Why wrong:** Didn't check cache layer first
- **Correction:** Should always check cache before API
### Key Breakthrough
- **Insight:** Realized cache invalidation logic was only running on UPDATE, not DELETE
- **Impact:** Led directly to the solution
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 134 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 1c3b6401c330
compound-docs is a skill published in the GitHub repository salavender/antigravity-compound-engineering-plugin (47 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 744 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to compound-docs, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…