Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nunoamorim99/agile-ledger --skill agile-ledger-workspacegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nunoamorim99/agile-ledgerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nunoamorim99/agile-ledger/agile-ledger-workspace)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nunoamorim99/agile-ledger/agile-ledger-workspace"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nunoamorim99/agile-ledger/agile-ledger-workspace/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nunoamorim99/agile-ledger/agile-ledger-workspace"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nunoamorim99/agile-ledger/agile-ledger-workspace.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00208 | $0.03018 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00083 | $0.01207 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00042 | $0.00604 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00302 |
Grade A, and why
agile-ledger-workspace scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 193 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agile-Ledger Workspace (the ledger repo)
The layer that owns where the ledger lives. Since v2.0 that is a dedicated ledger repository holding one folder per code repo:
<workspace-root>/ e.g. ~/Projetos/
├── agile-ledger/ ← THE LEDGER REPO — its own git repo, pushed like any other
│ ├── Registry.md # the marker + the map: repo slug ↔ code path ↔ remote ↔ sync state
│ ├── Config.md # org, clone target, filters, commit/push policy, default repo
│ ├── repo-a/ # the eight ledger files for repo-a
│ └── repo-b/
└── repo-a/ · repo-b/ ← the code repos, with NO ledger files in them
Why this shape. The PM layer changes on the PM's clock, many times a day; the code changes on the
developers' clock. Keeping the ledger out of the code repo means a backlog edit never reaches a
developer's working branch, nobody rebases or pulls to receive bookkeeping, and the whole portfolio is
readable — and diffable — in one place. One repo to clone, one place to look, one history of PM
decisions (ledger(repo-a): …).
The agile-ledger skill holds the PM rules and writes inside a repo folder. This skill decides which
folder that is, keeps Registry.md true, and talks to the network.
Golden safety rules (never violate)
These are stricter than the per-repo skill because this layer touches the network, the filesystem, and two git repos at once:
- Ledger files never go into a code repo. The ledger repo is the only home. A command that would
write Markdown into a project's working tree is wrong — the one exception is
/migrate-ledgerremoving a legacy folder, on a branch, after confirmation. Registry.mdis the map, not the truth about work. Each repo folder's own files are authoritative for that project's backlog, sprint, and releases.- Discovery uses your existing
ghauth. Rungh repo list <org> …(read-only). Never request, read, store, or handle tokens or credentials. Ifghis not authenticated, say so and stop. - Cloning downloads code → always propose and wait. List the repos that would be cloned and wait for
explicit confirmation before any
git clone. No hands-off cloning. - Never push, open a PR, or merge without confirmation — in either repo.
ledger_commitmay commit in the ledger repo;ledger_pushisoffby default and every push is confirmed when it happens. Changes in a code repo stay local on a branch and the user pushes. - Reconstructed work is always a proposal, never truth. Epics/stories mined from git land only in
the target repo folder's 💡 Inbox (
Ideas.md) as drafts flagged🔍 reconstructed from git — needs review. Never write acceptance criteria, estimates, or a Ready/Delivered state from inference. Never invent the "so that…". Never overwrite anything a human wrote. - Sweeps are read-only by default. Every state-changing action (clone, register, draft, commit) is surfaced and confirmed, then performed — not assumed.
- Never delete rows from the Registry; mark them
archived/goneinstead. - Migration copies before it removes. Verify the files landed in the ledger repo (and are committed) before offering to delete anything from a code repo.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 14d ago Changed · +52 lines · +29 tokens per session 1d96892f65f7
- 1mo ago First seen · 141 lines · 179 tokens per session scan A 56cd9413451c
agile-ledger-workspace is a skill published in the GitHub repository nunoamorim99/agile-ledger (1 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 208 tokens to every session and 3,018 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
team-workspace
Use to set up or work with a SHARED, git-backed team workspace for artifacts a team co-owns — team charters, strategy docs, decision records — kept strictly separate from your private reflections, which never leave your machine. Trigger phrases include "share our team charter with the team", "set up a shared…
chief-information-officer
The CIO's remit — running the technology the company works on, service quality, IT spend, and the boundary with product engineering. Use this to set IT priorities, decide what IT owns versus engineering, structure IT spend or an IT roadmap, judge whether to build, buy or outsource, or work out why IT is seen as a cost…
service-desk
Runs the IT service desk — intake, triage, prioritization, escalation, knowledge, and the metrics that improve service rather than distort it. Use this to set up or fix a service desk, design ticket priority and escalation, reduce repeat contacts, structure a knowledge base, or work out why a desk hitting its targets…
chief-operating-officer
Owns execution: how work actually gets done across the organization, including process, program management, capacity, vendors, supply chain, and service delivery. Use this when execution is the problem rather than strategy, to design or fix a process, to resolve cross-functional handoff failures, to plan capacity, to…
head-of-pmo
The EPMO lead's remit — what the PMO governs, what it must never become, and how it earns standing rather than compliance. Use this to stand up or reform a PMO, decide what it should and should not control, judge whether it is adding value or overhead, or work out why teams route around it.
chief-product-officer
Owns what gets built and why: product strategy, roadmap, discovery, user experience, and the definition of success for each release. Use this to decide what to build next, to cut scope, to turn a business goal into a product bet, to judge whether a feature is worth its cost, or when engineering and go-to-market…