Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add NVIDIA-NeMo/Megatron-Bridge --skill nemo-mbridge-perf-moe-optimization-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NVIDIA-NeMo/Megatron-BridgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nvidia-nemo/megatron-bridge/nemo-mbridge-perf-moe-optimization-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nvidia-nemo/megatron-bridge/nemo-mbridge-perf-moe-optimization-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nvidia-nemo/megatron-bridge/nemo-mbridge-perf-moe-optimization-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nvidia-nemo/megatron-bridge/nemo-mbridge-perf-moe-optimization-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nvidia-nemo/megatron-bridge/nemo-mbridge-perf-moe-optimization-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Agent Snooping · line 277 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.03432 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.01373 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00686 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00343 |
Grade A, and why
nemo-mbridge-perf-moe-optimization-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 332 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
MoE Training Optimization Workflow
Stable docs: @docs/training/moe-optimization.md Card: @skills/nemo-mbridge-perf-moe-optimization-workflow/card.yaml Source: Scalable Training of MoE Models with Megatron Core
Quick Reference
Start with the paper's Three Walls:
- memory wall
- communication wall
- compute-efficiency wall
For operational diagnosis, split the compute-efficiency wall into compute and host/launch bottlenecks. They need different evidence and different fixes. MoE tuning is iterative, so use this order:
freeze the measurement contract -> fit -> scale -> profile -> retune -> validate
First Answer Checklist
For MoE optimization workflow prompts, present the response in this order:
- Freeze the measurement contract: record the exact model and task, hardware and topology, container and commits, data and routing semantics, precision, sequence and batch shape, parallelism, graph scopes, and the steady-state metric window. Label each candidate as training-equivalent or benchmark-only.
- Fit: make the model memory-feasible first. Use the smallest model
parallelism that fits: keep dense TP as low as capacity allows while using
a large legal EP for expert weights. Prefer selective recompute before full
recompute, add offloading only after recompute and parallelism are
insufficient, and use
--fake-init-process-groupto sanity-check large layouts. - Scale: maximize DP after the model fits, keep hot communication inside the fastest interconnect, use PP plus VPP for multi-node scaling, prefer EP over extra TP for expert layers, and add CP when long context makes attention memory dominant.
- Profile: identify the dominant wall: memory, communication, host overhead, or compute.
- Retune: change one variable at a time based on the profiled bottleneck. Dispatcher, overlap, lower precision, CUDA graphs, and recompute are candidates, not hardware defaults.
- Validate: use short matched screens to reject candidates, then run the winner for at least 50 steps. Verify the requested backend or graph replay actually ran, time a declared post-warmup window, and report loss health, skipped/NaN iterations, memory, step time, and model TFLOPS/GPU.
- Include the exact Parallel Folding meshes:
Attention: TP x CP x DP x PPandMoE: ETP x EP x EDP x PP. - Use
alltoallfor safe bring-up, then A/Bflex+deepepandflex+hybridepwhen their packages and target topology support them. Start from BF16 and eager execution; introduce lower precision or the narrowest useful CUDA-graph scope only after profiling justifies it.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 332 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A a4423086d302
nemo-mbridge-perf-moe-optimization-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository NVIDIA-NeMo/Megatron-Bridge (970 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 3,432 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-platform-model-registry
Agent Platform Model Registry Management. Use when you need to upload, list, describe, update, or delete machine learning models (and their versions) in the Agent Platform Model Registry. Don't use for model training, model deployment to endpoints, or managing non-Agent Platform models.
foundry-config-setup
Resolve missing setup caused by a hardcoded Foundry project endpoint or model in a sample. Use when a sample fails because it uses a placeholder/hardcoded projectendpoint (for example "https://your-project.services.ai.azure.com") or a hardcoded model instead of reading them from the environment.
google-cloud-solution-agentic-analytics-spark-knowledge-catalog
Discovers requirements and designs an end-to-end governed agentic analytics solution using Knowledge Catalog and Managed Service for Apache Spark (Lightning Engine). Use when designing data science and analytics workflows across structured and unstructured distributed data (including in S3, Azure Blob, AlloyDB, and…
training-check
Interactively monitor training metrics from the current Codex session, periodically checking WandB or fallback logs for NaN, divergence, plateaus, and broken runs.
nemo-automodel-launcher-config
Configure NeMo AutoModel job launches for interactive runs, Slurm clusters, and SkyPilot cloud execution.
finetuning
Fine-tune models on Microsoft Foundry using SFT (supervised), DPO (preference), or RFT (reinforcement with graders). Covers dataset preparation, training job submission, deployment, and evaluation. USE FOR: fine-tune, SFT, DPO, RFT, training data, grader, distillation, fine-tuned model, training job, large file…