NVIDIA Model Optimizer is a library that changes deep-learning models through techniques such as quantization, pruning, distillation, neural architecture search, speculative decoding, and sparsity so they can run more efficiently. Developers use it to optimize Hugging Face, PyTorch, or ONNX models and export checkpoints for inference frameworks such as SGLang, TensorRT-LLM, TensorRT, or vLLM. The catalogue entries provide skills, instructions, and a plugin for using its workflows.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add NVIDIA/Model-Optimizer --skill evaluationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NVIDIA/Model-OptimizerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nvidia/model-optimizer/evaluation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nvidia/model-optimizer/evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nvidia/model-optimizer/evaluation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nvidia/model-optimizer/evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nvidia/model-optimizer/evaluation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 4 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Privilege Escalation · line 124 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
- high Privilege Escalation · line 469 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
- high Privilege Escalation · line 470 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
- high Privilege Escalation · line 471 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00110 | $0.02273 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00044 | $0.00909 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00455 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00227 |
Grade A, and why
evaluation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 152 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
NeMo Evaluator Launcher Assistant
Guide the user through creating NEL YAML configs, running evaluations, and monitoring progress. NEL manages serving for canaries and full runs; see Step 3's serving-handoff check for external endpoints.
Completed-run analysis
For completed runs, skip launch/config; use launching-evals for artifacts/analysis and apply run-validation.md before scores. Its policy overrides blanket uncapping and fixed token/context limits.
Workspace integration
If MODELOPT_WORKSPACE_ROOT is set, use the common skill's workspace-management.md and reuse existing workspaces (PTQ → checkpoint smoke test → NEL evaluation; carry compatibility requirements into NEL's deployment config).
Workflow
- [ ] Step 0: Check workspace (if MODELOPT_WORKSPACE_ROOT set)
- [ ] Step 1: Check `nel` install + existing config; set up `.env` (+ `modelopttools:eval-config` for judge-scored runs)
- [ ] Step 2: Build base config (5-question flow OR shortcut)
- [ ] Step 3: Configure deployment (model path, params, cross-check)
- [ ] Step 4: Fill remaining ??? values
- [ ] Step 5: Confirm tasks (iterative)
- [ ] Step 6: Multi-node (if needed)
- [ ] Step 7: Interceptors (if needed)
- [ ] Step 7.5: Container auth (SLURM private images)
- [ ] Step 8: Dry-run → canary → full run
- [ ] Step 9: Verify completed run
nel-next path (Terminal-Bench 2.x, SWE-bench, …) — branch here FIRST
A few agentic AA benchmarks do not run on the currently validated
nemo-evaluator-launcher 0.2.6 path (Steps 1–9 don't apply). They run on nel-next
(nemo-evaluator[harbor] 0.4.x) — a separate package, CLI (nel eval run), -O
overrides, and services/benchmarks/cluster/output schema. If the user asks
for one, do not add it to a 0.2.6 evaluation.tasks list — instead:
- Read
references/nel-next.md(shared: venv, schema, AWS creds, architecture, timeout strategy, MLflow, run flow) + the per-benchmark reciperecipes/tasks/aa_next/{terminal_bench_2_1,swebench_verified}.md; start fromrecipes/examples/example_eval_next.yaml. Read model-card research for generation settings; consult task-specific policy before selecting published budgets or fallbacks. - Isolated nel-next venv:
"$SKILL_DIR/scripts/nel-next.sh" --setup-only(keeps 0.2.6neluntouched). - Run
modelopttools:eval-config(Step 3b) to write the AWS-sandbox creds + harbor infra rows (${NEL_NEXT_EVAL_IMAGE},${HARBOR_*_ECR_REPOSITORY},${HARBOR_ECS_REGION}) into.env; always include theoutput.export_config.mlflowblock. - Dry-run → canary → full (
nel-next.sh eval run), then push to MLflow — SLURM doesn't auto-export, so runnel-next.sh mlflow-push -r <run_id> -c <cfg>after (config-driven; seereferences/nel-next.md). - Before reporting a full-run score, apply
references/run-validation.md, including its benchmark-specific checks.
What ships with it
34 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- recipes/env.example 2.8 KB
- recipes/examples/example_eval_next.yaml 8.3 KB
- recipes/examples/example_eval.yaml 11 KB
- recipes/examples/gym/example_mrcr.yaml 18 KB
- recipes/tasks/aa_next/swebench_verified.md 9.4 KB
- recipes/tasks/aa_next/terminal_bench_2_1.md 9.2 KB
- recipes/tasks/aa/gpqa_diamond.md 808 B
- recipes/tasks/aa/hle.md 1.6 KB
- recipes/tasks/aa/ifbench.md 585 B
- recipes/tasks/aa/lcr.md 3.0 KB
- recipes/tasks/aa/mmmu_pro.md 546 B
- recipes/tasks/aa/omniscience.md 2.1 KB
- recipes/tasks/aa/scicode.md 3.6 KB
- recipes/tasks/aa/tau2_bench_telecom.md 3.1 KB
- recipes/tasks/aime_2025.md 1.5 KB
- recipes/tasks/gym/mrcr.md 12 KB
- recipes/tasks/livecodebench.md 1.6 KB
- recipes/tasks/mmlu_pro.md 735 B
- references/doom_loops.md 3.8 KB
- references/gym.md 9.8 KB
- references/launcher-workflow.md 38 KB
- references/model-card-research.md 6.9 KB
- references/multi-node.md 1.7 KB
- references/nel-next.md 16 KB
- references/nvfp4-modelcard-sampling.md 9.1 KB
- references/parallelism.md 8.6 KB
- references/quantization-benchmarks.md 7.0 KB
- references/run-validation.md 12 KB
- references/slurm.md 1.6 KB
- scripts/nel-gym.sh 1.2 KB runs code
- scripts/nel-next.sh 7.8 KB runs code
- tests/evals.json 18 KB
- tests/test_example_mrcr.py 3.7 KB runs code
- tests/test_nel_gym.py 1.6 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · +3 lines 880b6e6c9b07
- 7d ago Changed · +1 lines c7d58bc15b60
- 13d ago Changed · +3 lines d742aff64a74
- 15d ago Changed · -3 tokens per session ed44a553495e
- 16d ago Changed · +4 lines · +18 tokens per session 5d916a48064e
- 23d ago Changed · +2 lines 4dd8b93f64be
- 29d ago Changed · -408 lines ffb5ba391b16
- 1mo ago Changed · -21 lines e77895e431e9
- 1mo ago Changed · +38 lines e112b13af630
- 1mo ago First seen · 530 lines · 95 tokens per session scan A 55e0ed27957a
evaluation is a skill published in the GitHub repository NVIDIA/Model-Optimizer (5,398 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 110 tokens to every session and 2,273 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-platform-model-registry
Agent Platform Model Registry Management. Use when you need to upload, list, describe, update, or delete machine learning models (and their versions) in the Agent Platform Model Registry. Don't use for model training, model deployment to endpoints, or managing non-Agent Platform models.
foundry-config-setup
Resolve missing setup caused by a hardcoded Foundry project endpoint or model in a sample. Use when a sample fails because it uses a placeholder/hardcoded projectendpoint (for example "https://your-project.services.ai.azure.com") or a hardcoded model instead of reading them from the environment.
google-cloud-solution-agentic-analytics-spark-knowledge-catalog
Discovers requirements and designs an end-to-end governed agentic analytics solution using Knowledge Catalog and Managed Service for Apache Spark (Lightning Engine). Use when designing data science and analytics workflows across structured and unstructured distributed data (including in S3, Azure Blob, AlloyDB, and…
training-check
Interactively monitor training metrics from the current Codex session, periodically checking WandB or fallback logs for NaN, divergence, plateaus, and broken runs.
nemo-automodel-launcher-config
Configure NeMo AutoModel job launches for interactive runs, Slurm clusters, and SkyPilot cloud execution.
finetuning
Fine-tune models on Microsoft Foundry using SFT (supervised), DPO (preference), or RFT (reinforcement with graders). Covers dataset preparation, training job submission, deployment, and evaluation. USE FOR: fine-tune, SFT, DPO, RFT, training data, grader, distillation, fine-tuned model, training job, large file…