Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to oasm-platform/open-asm. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/oasm-platform/open-asm/main/.agents/skills/requesting-code-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oasm-platform/open-asmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/oasm-platform/open-asm/requesting-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oasm-platform/open-asm/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oasm-platform/open-asm/requesting-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oasm-platform/open-asm/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oasm-platform/open-asm/requesting-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00685 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00274 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00137 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
requesting-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 106 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A a5ff68586ccf
requesting-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository oasm-platform/open-asm (259 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 685 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
find-security-vulnerabilities-in-code
Find security vulnerabilities in a codebase or repository with Strix — a white-box AI security review that reads your source, reasons about the actual data flow and authorization model, then exploits what it finds in a live sandbox so every reported issue has a working proof-of-concept instead of a noisy…
seven-question-gate
7-question gate run before promoting a finding to FINDING + opening a report. Kills weak/non-impactful findings before they reach the report stage and damage validity ratio.
detecting-shadow-api-endpoints
Discover and inventory shadow API endpoints that operate outside documented specifications using traffic analysis, code scanning, and API discovery platforms.
implementing-github-advanced-security-for-code-scanning
Configure GitHub Advanced Security with CodeQL to perform automated static analysis and vulnerability detection across repositories at enterprise scale.
source-assisted-analysis
Use attached source code as a SECONDARY accelerator for black-box testing - work the auto-seeded source-to-route ledger first, trace call paths before claiming a sink is reachable, find hidden routes and extra hypotheses, and correlate confirmed runtime behavior back to code. Black-box remains primary.
redteam-code-audit-detail-pack
Domain routing and boundary guidance for authorized source code security review, including dangerous function tracing, data-flow analysis, logic flaw detection, and dependency review. Use when a task belongs to the code audit domain and needs scope, evidence, pivot, or exit criteria.