Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add odin33g/family-court-strategist --skill lawyer-accountabilitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/odin33g/family-court-strategistWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/odin33g/family-court-strategist/lawyer-accountability)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/odin33g/family-court-strategist/lawyer-accountability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/odin33g/family-court-strategist/lawyer-accountability/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/odin33g/family-court-strategist/lawyer-accountability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/odin33g/family-court-strategist/lawyer-accountability.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.00856 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00342 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00171 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
lawyer-accountability scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 104 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Lawyer Accountability
Help the user systematically track, evaluate, and hold their legal representation accountable. Whether they currently have a solicitor or are reviewing past representation, this skill builds an evidence-based assessment.
What to Track
1. Communication Log
For every interaction with the solicitor, record:
- Date and method (email, phone, meeting)
- What was discussed
- What advice was given
- What the user was told to do
- What the solicitor said they would do
- What actually happened next
2. Cost Tracking
Build a detailed cost record:
- Cost agreement terms (hourly rate, estimate, fixed fee)
- Every invoice received (date, amount, description of work)
- Running total of costs vs original estimate
- Value assessment: what did each dollar achieve?
Ask: does the total cost make sense for the work done? Were there charges for work that didn't advance the case?
3. Advice Assessment
For every significant piece of advice, evaluate:
Was the advice in the client's interest?
- Did the advice consider all available evidence?
- Were alternatives presented?
- Was the client given time to consider?
- Did the advice align with the evidence or contradict it?
Was the client pressured?
- Was there a rushed timeline?
- Was the client told "this is your only option"?
- Were consequences overstated to force a decision?
- Was the client given proper opportunity to review documents?
What was NOT said?
- Were there arguments the lawyer didn't make?
- Evidence they didn't use?
- Witnesses they didn't call?
- Applications they didn't file?
- Subpoenas they didn't pursue?
4. Settlement Review (if applicable)
If the case was settled, assess:
- How much time was given to consider the offer?
- Was all evidence reviewed before settlement?
- Were there untested arguments that could have changed the outcome?
- Did the solicitor recommend settlement despite strong evidence?
- Was the client's consent truly informed?
Red Flags
Flag any of these to the user:
- Solicitor recommending settlement without reviewing all subpoena material
- Rushed settlement timelines (less than a week to decide)
- Advice that contradicts what the evidence shows
- Failure to pursue relevant subpoenas or evidence
- Not cross-examining key witnesses
- Billing for work that wasn't done or didn't advance the case
- Not explaining the implications of consent orders
- Failing to follow up on expert recommendations
- Not raising alienation when evidence supports it
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 104 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 3f7ab0900040
lawyer-accountability is a skill published in the GitHub repository odin33g/family-court-strategist (17 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 856 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
contract-and-proposal-writer
Generate professional, jurisdiction-aware business documents: freelance contracts, project proposals, SOWs, NDAs, and MSAs. Structured Markdown output with docx conversion instructions. Covers US (Delaware), EU (GDPR), UK, and DACH (German law) jurisdictions. Not a substitute for legal counsel — use as strong starting…
general-counsel-advisor
General Counsel advisory for startups: contract review (MSA, SaaS, NDA, DPA, employment), IP strategy, term sheet decoding, and regulatory landscape mapping. Use when reviewing any contract or term sheet, deciding when to engage outside counsel, defining IP strategy, evaluating regulatory exposure (HIPAA, GDPR, FDA…
ma-playbook
M&A strategy for acquiring companies or being acquired. Due diligence, valuation, integration, and deal structure. Use when evaluating acquisitions, preparing for acquisition, M&A due diligence, integration planning, or deal negotiation.
regulatory-audit-generator
Builds compliance checklists for business scenarios involving GDPR, PIPL, or advertising/data laws. Outputs a structured checklist with check items, legal basis, risk levels, and actionable recommendations. Triggered by requests like "run a compliance check," "GDPR/PIPL compliance," "pre-launch review," "privacy…
patent-chart
A patent claim comparison chart that breaks claims into technical features and compares each feature with patents, products, or standards using quoted evidence. A patent claim states what an invention legally covers; FTO means checking whether a product may infringe existing patents.
patent-oa
An assistant for preparing replies to patent office examination opinions in China. It can use stored past cases and practice manuals to help shape a draft, which must be reviewed before filing.