Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add ogrodev/fsociety/plugin install elliotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ogrodev/fsociety/reporting)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ogrodev/fsociety/reporting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ogrodev/fsociety/reporting/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ogrodev/fsociety/reporting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ogrodev/fsociety/reporting.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00290 | $0.03613 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00116 | $0.01445 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00058 | $0.00723 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00361 |
Grade A, and why
reporting scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 383 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Security Reporting
End-to-end pentest reporting for web and application security engagements -- from data gathering through structured report generation. This skill integrates deeply with elliot's data layer to produce comprehensive, evidence-backed deliverables aligned with OWASP Testing Guide and PTES reporting standards.
Why This Matters
The report is the only artifact the client keeps. Every vulnerability discovered, every technique attempted, every chain identified -- it all means nothing if the report is unclear, incomplete, or poorly structured. A good report drives remediation. A bad report gets filed and forgotten.
Report Lifecycle
Data Gathering --> Finding Prioritization --> Report Structure --> Writing --> Quality Review --> Delivery
Every phase draws on elliot's data layer. Skip nothing.
Phase 1 -- Data Gathering
Before writing a single line, collect all engagement data from elliot's trackers.
Vulnerability Data
# Full findings summary -- severity counts, status breakdown
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/findings-tracker.js" summary
# All findings with details
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/findings-tracker.js" list
# Search for specific finding types
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/findings-tracker.js" search sqli
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/findings-tracker.js" list --severity CRITICAL
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/findings-tracker.js" list --type xss
# Export findings as formatted HTML
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/findings-tracker.js" html
Testing Coverage
# Technique coverage summary -- tools used, results, gaps
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/techniques-tracker.js" summary
# Full coverage analysis -- what was tested, what was not
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/techniques-tracker.js" coverage
# All tool reports generated during the engagement
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/techniques-tracker.js" reports
# Export techniques as formatted HTML
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/techniques-tracker.js" html
# Search for specific technique results
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/techniques-tracker.js" list --result success
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/techniques-tracker.js" list --result blocked
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 383 lines · 290 tokens per session scan A dcb15941b42a
reporting is a skill published in the GitHub repository ogrodev/fsociety (20 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 290 tokens to every session and 3,613 once invoked, about $0.0012 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
mks
MKS (Metasploit-Kali Server) tool preference guide. Mount in Phase 0/1 alongside the primary skill. Provides URL resolution, REST endpoint patterns, response parsing, error handling, and fallback rules for all MKS-backed Kali tools.
pentest
Penetration testing orchestrator that coordinates specialized attack agents. Provides attack indexes, methodology frameworks, and documentation. Execution delegated to specialized agents (SQL Injection, XSS, SSRF, etc.). Use for engagement planning and attack coordination.
authenticating
Authentication testing skill - automates signup, login, 2FA bypass, CAPTCHA solving, and bot detection evasion using Playwright MCP. Tests authentication security controls. Includes behavioral biometrics simulation, OTP handling, and automated account creation for security assessments.
common-appsec-patterns
Application security testing coordinator for common vulnerability patterns including XSS, injection flaws, and client-side security issues. Orchestrates specialized testing agents to identify and validate common application security weaknesses.
web-application-mapping
Comprehensive web application reconnaissance and mapping coordinator that orchestrates passive browsing, active endpoint discovery, attack surface analysis, and headless browser automation for complete application coverage.
cve-testing
CVE vulnerability testing coordinator that identifies technology stacks, researches known vulnerabilities, and tests applications for exploitable CVEs using public exploits and proof-of-concept code.