Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Stickman230/claude-pentest --skill pentestgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Stickman230/claude-pentestWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stickman230/claude-pentest/pentest)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stickman230/claude-pentest/pentest"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stickman230/claude-pentest/pentest/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stickman230/claude-pentest/pentest"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stickman230/claude-pentest/pentest.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.02023 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.01012 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00405 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00202 |
Grade A, and why
pentest scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 160 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Coordinate penetration testing. Deploy executors, aggregate results, generate reports. Use it when user requests pentesting, security assessment, or vulnerability testing.
Workflow
Phase 1: Initialization
- Gather scope: Target URL, restrictions, testing window
- Create engagement folder:
outputs/{engagement-name}/
Phase 2: Reconnaissance (Read reference/RECONNAISSANCE_OUTPUT.md to get outputs format)
- Select reconnaissance tools based on asset type (domains, web apps, APIs, network, cloud)
- Run recon in parallel via the inventory agents (web-application-mapping) and domain-assessment
- Generate asset-specific inventory files in
outputs/{engagement}/inventory/(JSON per asset type) using the defined output format - Generate the consolidated
analysis/attack-surface.mdandanalysis/testing-checklist.mdusing the defined output format
Phase 3: Planning & Approval (MANDATORY)
- Analyze reconnaissance findings from
outputs/{engagement}/inventory/andoutputs/{engagement}/analysis/ - Create test plan: Executors to deploy, attack surface justification, testing approach
- Present plan to user via AskUserQuestion
- Get explicit approval if not already approved in the first phase: "Approve plan?", "Modify executors?", "Cancel?"
- CRITICAL: Do NOT proceed to Phase 4 without user approval
Phase 4: Vulnerability Testing
- Deploy approved executors in parallel (single Task call with run_in_background=True)
- Monitor progress: Periodic TaskOutput(block=False)
- Recursive spawning: New discoveries trigger new executors (ask approval if major change)
Phase 5: Aggregation
- Collect findings from all executors
- Deduplicate (same vuln + location = duplicate)
- Identify exploit chains
- Calculate severity metrics
Phase 6: Reporting (Read reference/FINAL_REPORT.md - includes DOCX conversion)
- CRITICAL: Create folder structure FIRST:
report/andprocessed/with subdirectories - Move ALL working files to
processed/: reconnaissance/, findings/, activity/ →processed/ - Move ALL intermediate files: ANY .md files, drafts, analysis →
processed/intermediate-reports/ - Generate markdown report: Use
reference/FINAL_REPORT.mdtemplate →processed/intermediate-reports/pentest-final-report.md - REQUIRED: Generate .docx: Run pandoc command →
report/Penetration-Test-Report.docx(cover page, TOC, body, appendix section) - Optional: Generate PDF: If LaTeX available →
report/Penetration-Test-Report.pdf, else skip (DOCX is primary deliverable) - Copy referenced evidence: Organize by finding →
report/appendix/finding-{id}/ - Create report README: Document deliverables in
report/README.md - VERIFY CLEAN STRUCTURE:
ls -la outputs/{engagement}/shows ONLYreport/andprocessed/ - CRITICAL: NO intermediate files in root or report/ - Everything goes to
processed/except final deliverables (.docx, .json, README, appendix/)
What ships with it
60 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- attacks/api-security/graphql/graphql-cheat-sheet.md 33 KB
- attacks/api-security/graphql/graphql-quickstart.md 16 KB
- attacks/api-security/graphql/payloads/injection.md 4.4 KB
- attacks/api-security/rest-api/api-testing-cheat-sheet.md 15 KB
- attacks/api-security/rest-api/api-testing-comprehensive-guide.md 42 KB
- attacks/api-security/web-llm/web-llm-attacks-cheat-sheet.md 25 KB
- attacks/api-security/web-llm/web-llm-attacks-quickstart.md 21 KB
- attacks/api-security/websockets/websockets-cheat-sheet.md 21 KB
- attacks/api-security/websockets/websockets-quickstart.md 17 KB
- attacks/authentication/auth-bypass/authentication-cheat-sheet.md 21 KB
- attacks/authentication/auth-bypass/authentication-quickstart.md 11 KB
- attacks/authentication/jwt/jwt_attack_techniques.md 38 KB
- attacks/authentication/jwt/jwt_security_resources.md 34 KB
- attacks/authentication/jwt/jwt-cheat-sheet.md 22 KB
- attacks/authentication/jwt/jwt-quickstart.md 13 KB
- attacks/authentication/jwt/portswigger_jwt_labs.md 57 KB
- attacks/authentication/oauth/oauth-cheat-sheet.md 34 KB
- attacks/authentication/oauth/oauth-quickstart.md 18 KB
- attacks/authentication/password-attacks/password-attacks.md 18 KB
- attacks/client-side/clickjacking/clickjacking-cheat-sheet.md 11 KB
- attacks/client-side/clickjacking/clickjacking-quickstart.md 9.9 KB
- attacks/client-side/cors/cors-cheat-sheet.md 22 KB
- attacks/client-side/cors/cors-quickstart.md 15 KB
- attacks/client-side/cors/payloads/misconfigs.md 3.5 KB
- attacks/client-side/csrf/csrf-quickstart.md 12 KB
- attacks/client-side/dom-based/dom-based-vulnerabilities-complete.md 75 KB
- attacks/client-side/dom-based/dom-xss-quickstart.md 8.9 KB
- attacks/client-side/prototype-pollution/payloads/basic.md 2.8 KB
- attacks/client-side/prototype-pollution/prototype-pollution-cheat-sheet.md 26 KB
- attacks/client-side/prototype-pollution/prototype-pollution-quickstart.md 17 KB
- attacks/client-side/xss/payloads/basic.md 2.1 KB
- attacks/client-side/xss/payloads/bypass.md 2.1 KB
- attacks/client-side/xss/payloads/dom.md 2.4 KB
- attacks/client-side/xss/xss-bypass-techniques.md 18 KB
- attacks/client-side/xss/xss-exploitation-techniques.md 29 KB
- attacks/cloud-containers/aws/cloud-security.md 23 KB
- attacks/cloud-containers/aws/payloads/techniques.md 4.2 KB
- attacks/cloud-containers/azure/cloud-security.md 23 KB
- attacks/cloud-containers/azure/payloads/techniques.md 4.7 KB
- attacks/cloud-containers/docker/cloud-security.md 23 KB
- attacks/cloud-containers/gcp/cloud-security.md 23 KB
- attacks/cloud-containers/kubernetes/cloud-security.md 23 KB
- attacks/essential-skills/burp-suite/essential-skills-cheat-sheet.md 16 KB
- attacks/essential-skills/burp-suite/essential-skills-quickstart.md 8.0 KB
- attacks/essential-skills/methodology/README.md 4.2 KB
- attacks/essential-skills/methodology/web-application-attacks.md 26 KB
- attacks/essential-skills/playwright-automation.md 23 KB
- attacks/essential-skills/reporting/PROFESSIONAL_REPORT_STANDARD.md 32 KB
- attacks/essential-skills/reporting/report-templates.md 21 KB
- attacks/injection/command-injection/os-command-injection-cheat-sheet.md 14 KB
- attacks/injection/command-injection/os-command-injection-quickstart.md 10 KB
- attacks/injection/command-injection/payloads/bypass.md 1.6 KB
- attacks/injection/command-injection/payloads/unix.md 1.5 KB
- attacks/injection/command-injection/payloads/windows.md 1.7 KB
- attacks/injection/file-inclusion/payloads/lfi.md 5.8 KB
- attacks/injection/file-inclusion/payloads/rfi.md 4.1 KB
- attacks/injection/file-inclusion/payloads/wrappers.md 5.1 KB
- attacks/injection/ldap-injection/payloads/basic.md 1.5 KB
- attacks/injection/ldap-injection/payloads/bypass.md 1.5 KB
- attacks/injection/nosql-injection/nosql-injection-cheat-sheet.md 19 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 160 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A d87585b2028b
pentest is a skill published in the GitHub repository Stickman230/claude-pentest (100 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 2,023 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
api-security-testing
Security-test a REST, GraphQL, or gRPC API with Strix — autonomous agents that enumerate endpoints from an OpenAPI/GraphQL schema (or by crawling), then actually exploit the API-specific vulnerability classes in the OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023) — broken object-level authorization (BOLA/IDOR), broken object…
fix-security-vulnerabilities-with-strix
Fix security vulnerabilities found by a Strix pentest (open-source CLI or app.strix.ai cloud) — triage by severity, patch the root cause rather than the symptom, and re-run Strix to prove each fix actually closes the exploit. Handles injection, XSS, SSRF, broken access control, IDOR, and other validated findings. Use…
owasp-top-10-testing
Test an application against the OWASP Top 10 with Strix — autonomous AI agents that attempt real exploits for each category of the current OWASP Top 10:2025 (broken access control including SSRF, security misconfiguration, software supply chain failures, cryptographic failures, injection, insecure design…
find-security-vulnerabilities-in-code
Find security vulnerabilities in a codebase or repository with Strix — a white-box AI security review that reads your source, reasons about the actual data flow and authorization model, then exploits what it finds in a live sandbox so every reported issue has a working proof-of-concept instead of a noisy…
web-app-penetration-testing
Pentest a web app or website end to end — black-box testing of a live URL, staging environment, or local dev server that finds and exploits real vulnerabilities (auth bypass, broken access control, IDOR, injection, XSS, SSRF, business logic) and proves each one with a working proof-of-concept instead of a signature…
managed-pentesting-with-strix
Run a managed pentest of a web app, API, repository, or local workspace on the app.strix.ai platform with the strix cloud CLI or REST API — no local Docker or LLM key needed. Safely review and upload local source, register assets, launch and poll scans, triage vulnerabilities, export SARIF, download compliance…