Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to oh-my-engine/oh-my-engine. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/oh-my-engine/oh-my-engine/main/.claude/skills/ome-spec/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oh-my-engine/oh-my-engineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/oh-my-engine/oh-my-engine/ome-spec)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oh-my-engine/oh-my-engine/ome-spec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oh-my-engine/oh-my-engine/ome-spec/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oh-my-engine/oh-my-engine/ome-spec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oh-my-engine/oh-my-engine/ome-spec.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.02658 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.01329 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00532 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00266 |
Grade A, and why
ome-spec scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 309 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ome-spec
基于规范驱动的开发工作流,兼�?OpenSpec 的目录和生命周期,同时保�?Oh My Engine �?skill 分发和记忆系统�?
使用方法
# 初始�?spec 工作�?
/ome-spec init
# 导入 PRD / 提示�?/ 附件
/ome-spec import <change-id>
# 基于导入上下文拆�?spec 草案
/ome-spec decompose <change-id>
# 手工创建变更提案(保留)
/ome-spec propose <change-id>
# 约束较强的变�?
/ome-spec propose <change-id> --design-first
# Bug 修复
/ome-spec propose <change-id> --bugfix
# 细化设计与任�?
/ome-spec plan <change-id>
# 执行开�?
/ome-spec apply <change-id>
# 验证完成�?
/ome-spec verify <change-id>
# 归档并更新长期规�?
/ome-spec archive <change-id>
Claude Code 可直接使用上面的 slash command�?
Codex 请按技能名 ome-spec 触发,并沿用相同子命令和参数�?
可执行入�?
主入口是 TypeScript 驱动�?ome spec�?
ome spec init
ome spec import <change-id> --source-file docs/prd.md --prompt-file docs/prompt.md
ome spec import <change-id> --source-text "Copied PRD text" --asset mockup.png
ome spec decompose <change-id>
ome spec propose <change-id>
ome spec plan <change-id>
ome spec apply <change-id>
ome spec apply <change-id> --task "Implement the change"
ome spec status <change-id>
ome spec verify <change-id>
ome spec archive <change-id>
ome spec propose <change-id> --design-first
ome spec propose <change-id> --bugfix
旧的 shell 兼容转发器已移除;统一使用 ome spec�?
脚本能力边界�?
init:创建工作区和默认配�?import:将 PRD、提示词、附件归档到context/decompose:基�?context/准备analysis.md和标�?OpenSpec scaffoldpropose:生�?change scaffoldplan:标记计划阶段并�?Planning Notesapply:输出实现上下文、已采纳 skill �?execution directives,并支持勾选任�?验收项回写进�?status:汇总当�?phase、任务计数、engine-memory context �?execution directive 数量verify:基�?tasks.md、proposal.md的勾选项、TBD:模板标记检查、spec delta 完整性,以及config.json里的verifyCommands做通过/失败判断archive:在 verify 通过后归�?change,并在首次接受时创建长期 capability spec,之后基于已接受 delta 重建 canonical summary/requirements/compatibility,同时持续同步当前快照与历史
apply 不会自动改业务代码;它会把已采纳 skill 转成必须遵循�?execution directives,直接作用于实现提示�?
目录约定
Spec 工作�?
.ome/omespec/
├── project.md
├── changes/
�? └── <change-id>/
�? ├── context/
�? �? ├── source.md
�? �? ├── prompt.md
�? �? ├── analysis.md
�? �? ├── references.json
�? �? └── assets/
�? ├── proposal.md
�? ├── design.md
�? ├── tasks.md
�? └── specs/
�? └── <capability>/
�? └── spec.md
├── specs/
�? └── <capability>/
�? └── spec.md
└── archive/
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 309 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A ee5ea86b6ccf
ome-spec is a skill published in the GitHub repository oh-my-engine/oh-my-engine (5 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 2,658 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
spec-writing
Write a spec that a different engineer could implement without asking questions. Invoke when starting a new feature, especially one that will be handed off or implemented later.
ai-loop
Runs a bounded spec-build-review development loop with explicit scope, stop conditions, and human approval gates for risky or ambiguous work.
workflow
Use when a task is too large for turn-by-turn orchestration and should run through the big-task workflow lane: system-wide changes, large migrations, repo-wide audits, high-confidence verification, or tasks explicitly asking to run a workflow. Claude Code uses native dynamic workflows; Codex, OpenCode, and Grok use…
Workspine
Disciplined repo-native workflow for AI-assisted development. Spec first, then build, then verify.
absolute-work
End-to-end, phase-gated SDLC for AI coding agents: relentless design interview → reviewed spec → dependency-graphed task board → safe-wave TDD execution → verification → converge. Handles features, bugs, refactors, greenfield projects, planning breakdowns, and migrations. Triggers on "absolute work", "build this…
absolute-spec
Lightweight standalone design spec for AI coding agents: codebase scan → bounded clarify pass (3–5 questions, not a grill) → reviewed design doc written to docs/plans/ → independent scored review → stop. No task board, no build. Use when you want a spec to discuss, hand off, or review before committing to…