Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/oleg494/coding-kit/incremental-implementationnpx skills add oleg494/coding-kit --skill incremental-implementationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oleg494/coding-kitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00052 | $0.00728 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00364 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00146 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
incremental-implementation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Incremental Implementation
Overview
Build in thin vertical slices — implement one piece, test it, verify it, then expand. Each increment should leave the system in a working, testable state.
The Increment Cycle
Implement ──→ Test ──→ Verify ──→ Commit ──→ Next slice
For each slice:
- Implement the smallest complete piece of functionality
- Test — run the test suite (or write a test if none exists)
- Verify — confirm the slice works (tests pass, build succeeds)
- Commit — save progress with descriptive message
- Move to the next slice
Slicing Strategies
Vertical Slices (Preferred)
Build one complete path through the stack:
Slice 1: Create (DB + API + basic UI) → user can create
Slice 2: List (query + API + UI) → user can see
Slice 3: Edit (update + API + UI) → user can modify
Slice 4: Delete → full CRUD complete
Contract-First Slicing
Slice 0: Define API contract (types, interfaces)
Slice 1a: Implement backend against contract
Slice 1b: Implement frontend against mock data
Slice 2: Integrate and test end-to-end
Risk-First Slicing
Tackle the riskiest piece first. If it fails, you discover it before investing in everything else.
Implementation Rules
Rule 0: Simplicity First
Before writing code, ask: "What is the simplest thing that could work?"
Rule 0.5: Scope Discipline
Touch only what the task requires. Do NOT:
- "Clean up" adjacent code
- Refactor imports in files you're not modifying
- Add features not in the spec because they "seem useful"
- Modernize syntax in files you're only reading
If you notice something worth improving outside scope, note it — don't fix it.
Rule 1: One Thing at a Time
Each increment changes one logical thing. Don't mix concerns.
Rule 2: Keep It Compilable
After each increment, project must build and existing tests must pass.
Rule 3: Feature Flags for Incomplete Features
const ENABLE_FEATURE = process.env.FEATURE_X === 'true';
if (ENABLE_FEATURE) { /* new code */ }
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 93 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A c0e599dce4ea
incremental-implementation is a skill published in the GitHub repository oleg494/coding-kit (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 728 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
run
Execute a named agent role with optimized instructions. Explicit invocation only ($run). Never trigger implicitly.
tip
Deliver a transformative life perspective shift and a productivity tip. Use when the user invokes /tip or wants non-technical inspiration or a fresh mental model.
agentic-security-review
Run a security and dependency audit for agent systems, tool-using AI apps, MCP/A2A integrations, or security-sensitive AI-generated code. Check slopsquatting risk, tool shadowing, rug pulls, memory/context poisoning, secrets, unsafe permissions, and common CWE patterns. Use when asked for security review, dependency…
agentic-spec
Create a structured specification before agentic coding work. Assemble the six context types, scale rigor for prototype/internal/production tasks, produce SPEC.md, and configure focused AGENTS.md boundaries. Use when asked to write a spec, plan a feature, design an agent/system, define architecture, or create…
agentic-evals
Design evaluation contracts and test plans for agentic systems. Create deterministic tests, trajectory evals, quality dimensions, gold-set criteria, and CI gates before or after implementation. Use when asked for tests first, an eval plan, success criteria, non-deterministic testing, LLM-as-judge setup, or…
agentic-production-readiness
Prepare an AI agent system for production operation. Cover SHIELD controls, sandbox/canary/production rollout, OpenTelemetry observability with GenAI semantic conventions, Agent Card drafting, governance, and post-deploy monitoring. Use for production readiness checks, go-live checklists, agent monitoring, agent…