Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Omar-Obando/qwen-orchestrator --skill security-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Omar-Obando/qwen-orchestratorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/omar-obando/qwen-orchestrator/security-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/omar-obando/qwen-orchestrator/security-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/omar-obando/qwen-orchestrator/security-code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.02135 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.01068 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00427 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00214 |
Grade A, and why
security-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 337 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Security Code Review Skill — Reviewer & Quality Gatekeeper
Overview
This skill provides comprehensive guidance for security code reviews following OWASP Top 10 standards. It covers vulnerability detection, secure coding standards, authentication/authorization patterns, and vulnerability remediation following CSSLP and CISSP certification standards.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Performing security code reviews
- Reviewing code for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities
- Checking authentication and authorization implementations
- Reviewing API security implementations
- Analyzing input validation and sanitization
- Checking cryptographic implementations
- Reviewing session management
- Analyzing error handling for information disclosure
- Checking for security misconfigurations
- Reviewing dependency security
- Analyzing logging and monitoring for security events
- Checking for injection vulnerabilities
- Reviewing file upload and access controls
- Analyzing business logic vulnerabilities
- Checking for insecure direct object references
- Reviewing cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities
- Analyzing cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protections
- Checking for sensitive data exposure
- Reviewing security headers and CSP
- Analyzing rate limiting and DDoS protections
- Checking for insecure deserialization
- Reviewing security configuration management
- Analyzing mobile app security patterns
Do NOT use this skill when:
- Writing application business logic (use domain-driven skill)
- Designing database schemas (use database-design skill)
- Writing API endpoint specifications (use api-design skill)
- Performing general code review (use code-review skill)
- Writing SQL queries (use sql-best-practices skill)
- Designing multi-page website layouts (use design-system skill)
- Analyzing deployment configurations (use deployment skill)
- Writing documentation (use documentation-best-practices skill)
OWASP Top 10 (2025) Checklist
A01: Broken Access Control
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 337 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 711b2424cc4d
security-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Omar-Obando/qwen-orchestrator (48 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 2,135 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
loopx-change-quality
Qualify the exact final diff for a LoopX-managed goal. Use when goal policy enables changequalityqualification, before a non-trivial delivery or merge, and when producing or repairing an exact-scope quality receipt. The workflow is language-neutral, permits at most one policy-authorized safe-fix pass, and never grants…
loopx-pr-review
Use for /loopx-pr-review or evidence-backed PR queue review. Run loopx pr-review first, execute the capability-owned review plan for each selected exact head, then publish full bilingual PR reviews (complete Chinese five-block review plus one concise English verdict) that match the verified findings. Use…
claude_code_delegation
Delegate coding, review, and refactor tasks to Claude Code CLI through Row-Bot's approval-gated shell workflow.
developer_pr_prep
Prepare branches, diffs, tests, and GitHub PR text from Developer Studio.
developer_review
Code-review workflow for Developer Studio repositories.
gh-issues
Process GitHub issues as an automation queue: /gh-issues lists and filters issues, confirms selected issue numbers, deduplicates fix/issue- work, delegates one focused PR per issue, and can monitor issue-fix PR review feedback. Use this instead of general PR workflow tools only when the entry point is a GitHub issue…