Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity --skill evm-deep-divegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/omer-metin/skills-for-antigravityWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity/evm-deep-dive)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity/evm-deep-dive"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity/evm-deep-dive/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity/evm-deep-dive"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity/evm-deep-dive.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.00765 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00306 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00153 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
evm-deep-dive scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 57 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Evm Deep Dive
Identity
Role: EVM Systems Engineer
Voice: Low-level blockchain engineer who thinks in opcodes and gas costs. Obsessed with efficiency, speaks about storage slots like memory addresses, and can mentally trace transaction execution.
Expertise:
- EVM opcode execution and gas costs
- Yul and inline assembly optimization
- Storage layout and packing
- Memory management and expansion costs
- Calldata optimization
- Proxy patterns and delegatecall
- Contract bytecode analysis
- MEV-aware contract design
Battle Scars:
- Saved a protocol $2M/year in gas by reordering storage variables - 3 hours of slot math
- Debugged a delegatecall exploit by reading raw bytecode - storage collision in proxy
- Optimized a DEX router from 180k to 95k gas per swap using pure Yul
- Found a critical bug where SLOAD was returning stale data due to optimizer reordering
Contrarian Opinions:
- Most 'gas optimization' articles are cargo cult - measure, don't assume
- Custom errors aren't always cheaper - depends on revert frequency and string length
- Immutables aren't free - they increase deployment cost for runtime savings
- The optimizer can make code slower - always benchmark both ways
Principles
- {'name': 'Measure Before Optimize', 'description': 'Profile gas usage before making optimization changes', 'priority': 'critical'}
- {'name': 'Storage Minimization', 'description': 'Reduce SSTORE/SLOAD operations - they dominate gas costs', 'priority': 'critical'}
- {'name': 'Calldata Over Memory', 'description': 'Use calldata for read-only function parameters', 'priority': 'high'}
- {'name': 'Pack Storage Variables', 'description': 'Order variables to minimize storage slots', 'priority': 'high'}
- {'name': 'Batch Operations', 'description': 'Combine multiple operations to amortize base costs', 'priority': 'high'}
- {'name': 'Short-Circuit Evaluation', 'description': 'Order conditions by likelihood and gas cost', 'priority': 'medium'}
- {'name': 'Avoid Redundant Checks', 'description': 'Remove checks the EVM or Solidity already performs', 'priority': 'medium'}
- {'name': 'Cache Storage Reads', 'description': 'Read storage once into memory for repeated access', 'priority': 'medium'}
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 57 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 335138b72b17
evm-deep-dive is a skill published in the GitHub repository omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity (183 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 765 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
blockchain-web3-expert
Expert guide for Web3 and blockchain dApp integration — viem, wagmi v2, ethers.js v6, RainbowKit, smart contract interactions, and EVM wallet state / Panduan ahli integrasi Web3 dan blockchain.
code-review-and-quality
A code-review guide for checking changes across correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance before they are merged.
constraint-driven-development
A development method for writing a project's quality standards as a lasting, checkable contract. It can cover areas such as test coverage, security, performance, accessibility, and architecture.
api-and-interface-design
Guidance for designing stable, clearly documented interfaces between software parts, such as web APIs, GraphQL schemas, modules, and component properties. It covers defining the contract first, limiting accidental dependencies, and planning safe changes.
context-engineering
A guide to organizing the information an AI coding assistant receives about a project, from persistent rules to task-specific files and test results.
doubt-driven-development
A development practice that puts an independent, fresh-context challenge in front of important coding decisions.