Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/onebrain-ai/onebrain/braindumpnpx skills add onebrain-ai/onebrain --skill braindumpgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/onebrain-ai/onebrainWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00076 | $0.00825 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00413 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00165 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00082 |
Grade A, and why
braindump scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Braindump
Capture everything on your mind right now. Don't filter : just say it.
Step 1: Invite the Dump
Say:
Go for it : what's on your mind? Dump everything. I'll sort it out.
Wait for the user to share their thoughts. Don't interrupt.
Step 2: Classify the Content
Silently analyze and classify each item:
| Type | Description | Destination |
|---|---|---|
| Task | Something to do | Extract as task with date |
| Idea | Creative or speculative thought | File to inbox |
| Note | Fact, reference, or information | File to inbox |
| Project | Something needing a dedicated note | Create/update in [projects_folder]/ |
| Question | Open question or uncertainty | File to inbox with ? tag |
| Feeling/Reflection | Personal reflection or emotion | File to inbox |
Step 3: Create Inbox File
File immediately : do not ask for confirmation first.
Create [inbox_folder]/YYYY-MM-DD-braindump.md. If a file with that name already exists: glob [inbox_folder]/YYYY-MM-DD-braindump*.md, count matches N, use suffix -NN (zero-padded to 2 digits, e.g. -02, -03):
---
tags: [inbox, braindump]
created: YYYY-MM-DD
---
# Braindump : [Month DD, YYYY]
## Raw Thoughts
[Full text of what the user shared, lightly formatted]
## Ideas
- [idea 1]
## Notes & References
- [note 1]
## Open Questions
- [question]?
## Related Notes
[[Link to relevant existing notes if any]]
(Omit this section if no related notes are found)
Find related notes via the search tools if available; fallback: Glob [projects_folder]/**/*.md, [areas_folder]/**/*.md, [knowledge_folder]/**/*.md, [resources_folder]/**/*.md. For search-tool results, only include candidates with rerank_score ≥ 0.30 (prefer ≥ 0.60) — drop anything below 0.30. Omit ## Related Notes if nothing relevant found (or nothing clears the threshold).
Step 4: Check for Project Links
If any item is a direct update, task, or decision for an active project in MEMORY.md (not a passing mention), append a brief note to that project file automatically. Mention it in the confirmation.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 99 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 4910d2b80a94
braindump is a skill published in the GitHub repository onebrain-ai/onebrain (25 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 825 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
excalidraw-diagram
Generate Excalidraw diagrams from text content. Supports three output modes - Obsidian (.md), Standard (.excalidraw), and Animated (.excalidraw with animation order). Triggers on "Excalidraw", "diagram", "standard excalidraw", "animate".
mermaid-visualizer
Transform text content into professional Mermaid diagrams for presentations and documentation. Use when users ask to visualize concepts, create flowcharts, or make diagrams from text. Supports process flows, system architectures, comparisons, mindmaps, and more with built-in syntax error prevention.
qmd
Search the vault using QMD semantic search. Use PROACTIVELY before reading files. Preference order: (1) MCP tools — mcpqmdquery, mcpqmdget, mcpqmdmultiget, mcpqmdstatus — if they appear in your tool menu, use them first; (2) CLI qmd --index ... as fallback; (3) Grep/Glob only when QMD is not installed. Trigger…
obsidian-cli
Interact with Obsidian vaults using the Obsidian CLI to read, create, search, and manage notes, tasks, properties, and more. Also supports plugin and theme development with commands to reload plugins, run JavaScript, capture errors, take screenshots, and inspect the DOM. Use when the user asks to interact with their…
deeppapernote
Generate a high-quality deep-reading note for a single paper and write it into an Obsidian-style vault. Use when the user gives a paper title, DOI, URL, arXiv ID, Zotero item, or local PDF and wants a polished Markdown note with strong structure, evidence-based analysis, and figure placeholders.
paper-glossary
Use when building reusable Obsidian glossary notes from an existing paper source manifest, optionally with a raw-sections override, especially when a reader needs a reviewed shortlist before glossary notes and article links are changed.