Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Ootto-AI/claude-content-skills --skill campaign-briefgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ootto-AI/claude-content-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ootto-ai/claude-content-skills/campaign-brief)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ootto-ai/claude-content-skills/campaign-brief"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ootto-ai/claude-content-skills/campaign-brief/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ootto-ai/claude-content-skills/campaign-brief"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ootto-ai/claude-content-skills/campaign-brief.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00111 | $0.00643 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00056 | $0.00321 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00129 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
campaign-brief scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 46 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Campaign Brief
Create the shared decision document that keeps a social campaign focused on one real outcome, one truthful promise, and clear channel roles.
1. Confirm the business decision
Ask what must change, by when, and for whom. Name one primary outcome such as qualified sign-ups, waitlist intent, event attendance, product education, or retained attention. Record the measurement source before choosing a vanity metric.
2. Establish the claim boundary
Collect the approved offer, audience evidence, product facts, proof, limitations, and required legal or brand constraints. Separate facts the team can say now from hypotheses the campaign may test. If proof is missing, make the campaign ask a question or demonstrate a workflow rather than assert an outcome.
3. Define the campaign spine
Write the audience situation, the useful tension, the promise, the proof available, and the action requested. Add the explicit non-goal so the team does not turn every campaign into a broad awareness exercise. Give each channel a role rather than copying one message everywhere.
4. Turn the brief into execution decisions
Provide message pillars, approved examples, prohibited claims, required assets, owners, timing, measurement events, and review gates. Include open questions with a named owner. The output should let a writer, creator manager, and operator make consistent choices without inventing strategy in the comments.
Hard rules
- Do not set a target or promise that has no measurement source or proof.
- Keep one primary action; secondary actions must not compete with it.
- Do not claim results, integrations, customer stories, or availability that the product team has not approved.
- Distinguish an experiment from a commitment to customers.
- Name the audience context, not an assumed demographic stereotype.
Failure modes
| Failure | Do this instead |
|---|---|
| The brief is a list of deliverables | Start with the decision, audience situation, promise, proof, and action. |
| Every channel gets identical work | Give channels complementary jobs based on their format and audience context. |
| Measurement happens after launch | Specify the event, owner, and reporting cadence in the brief. |
| Claims outrun evidence | Narrow the promise, add a demonstration, or wait for approved proof. |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 46 lines · 111 tokens per session scan A f262b51a477a
campaign-brief is a skill published in the GitHub repository Ootto-AI/claude-content-skills (30 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 111 tokens to every session and 643 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
scrapecreators-api
Scrape and extract public data from 27+ social media platforms using the ScrapeCreators REST API. Covers TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter/X, Reddit, Threads, Bluesky, Pinterest, Snapchat, Twitch, Kick, Truth Social, TikTok Shop, Google, and link-in-bio services (Linktree, Komi, Pillar, Linkbio…
outlier-post-finder
Use when the user wants to find posts, videos, reels, shorts, tweets, or social content that overperformed versus a creator, brand, or competitor baseline. Finds outliers, explains why they worked, extracts hooks and formats, and produces a practical swipe file.
ad-library-teardown
Use when the user wants to analyze active ads from Meta/Facebook, Google, or LinkedIn ad libraries; tear down a competitor's messaging; extract hooks, offers, CTAs, video transcripts, landing page claims, and test ideas from public ads.
comment-mining
Use when the user wants to mine comments and replies for audience reactions, customer language, questions, objections, complaints, product ideas, buying intent, sentiment, or voice-of-customer insights from public social posts and videos.
competitor-social-research
Use when the user wants to research competitors' social media strategy, compare brands or creators, find what content is working in a niche, identify content gaps, or produce a practical social strategy brief from public social data.
transcript-intelligence
Use when the user wants to summarize, analyze, or repurpose transcripts from TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, X/Twitter, LinkedIn, Rumble, or Reddit video posts. Extracts hooks, claims, quotes, content atoms, themes, and reusable scripts.