GSD Pi is a command-line coding agent and project workflow system that plans, implements, verifies, and tracks software work through milestones, tasks, Git worktrees, and stored project notes. It is for developers who want structured, longer-running agent sessions using different model providers. The catalogue entries extend GSD Pi with skills and agents.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add open-gsd/gsd-pi --skill lintgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/open-gsd/gsd-piWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/open-gsd/gsd-pi/lint)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/open-gsd/gsd-pi/lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/open-gsd/gsd-pi/lint.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 5 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 31 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 32 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 36 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 42 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 43 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01808 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00904 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00362 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00181 |
Grade A, and why
lint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<working_directory_awareness>
Before running any git or build command: check whether your dispatch context specifies a working directory (look for "Working directory:" in your initial prompt). If it does and pwd does not match it, prefix every git invocation with -C <that path> (e.g. git -C /path/to/worktree diff --name-only) and run linters/formatters with the explicit path argument. Linting the wrong directory is a silent failure mode.
</working_directory_awareness>
- No arguments: Lint only files changed in the current working tree (
git diff --name-onlyandgit diff --cached --name-only). - A file or directory path: Lint only that specific path (e.g.,
/lint src/utils). --fix: Automatically apply safe fixes. Can be combined with a path (e.g.,/lint src/ --fix).--fixwithout a path: Auto-fix changed files only.
Parse the arguments before proceeding. If --fix is present, set fix mode. If a non-flag argument is present, treat it as the target path.
JavaScript/TypeScript Linters:
-
Biome — Look for
biome.jsonorbiome.jsoncin the project root.- Lint command:
npx @biomejs/biome check .(or--applywith--fix) - Format command:
npx @biomejs/biome format .(or--writewith--fix) - Biome handles both linting and formatting. No need for a separate formatter if Biome is detected.
- Lint command:
-
ESLint — Look for
.eslintrc,.eslintrc.*(js, cjs, json, yml, yaml),eslint.config.*(js, mjs, cjs, ts, mts, cts), or an"eslintConfig"key inpackage.json.- Lint command:
npx eslint .(or--fixwith--fix) - Check
package.jsonfor the installed version. ESLint 9+ uses flat config (eslint.config.*).
- Lint command:
JavaScript/TypeScript Formatters (only if Biome was NOT detected):
- Prettier — Look for
.prettierrc,.prettierrc.*,prettier.config.*, or a"prettier"key inpackage.json.- Format check:
npx prettier --check . - Format fix:
npx prettier --write .
- Format check:
Rust:
- rustfmt — Look for
rustfmt.tomlor.rustfmt.toml, orCargo.tomlin the project root.- Format check:
cargo fmt -- --check - Format fix:
cargo fmt - Lint:
cargo clippy(if available)
- Format check:
Go:
- Go tools — Look for
go.modin the project root.- Format check:
gofmt -l . - Format fix:
gofmt -w . - Lint:
golangci-lint run(if installed), otherwisego vet ./...
- Format check:
Python:
-
Ruff — Look for
ruff.tomlor a[tool.ruff]section inpyproject.toml.- Lint command:
ruff check .(or--fixwith--fix) - Format command:
ruff format .(or--checkwithout--fix)
- Lint command:
-
Black — Look for a
[tool.black]section inpyproject.toml, orblackin requirements files.- Format check:
black --check . - Format fix:
black .
- Format check:
If no linter or formatter is detected, inform the user and suggest common options for their project type based on the files present.
Step 1: Determine target files
- If a path argument was provided, use that path.
- If no path argument, get changed files:
Filter to files that still exist on disk. If no files are changed, inform the user and offer to lint the entire project instead.git diff --name-only git diff --cached --name-only
Step 2: Run the detected tools
Run the linter and/or formatter against the target files or directory.
- Without
--fix: Run in check/report mode only. Do NOT modify any files. - With
--fix: Run with auto-fix flags enabled.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 146 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 83cd4522e31a
lint is a skill published in the GitHub repository open-gsd/gsd-pi (1,205 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,808 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
gsd-debug
Systematic debugging with persistent state across context resets.
gsd-forensics
Post-mortem investigation for failed GSD workflows — diagnoses what went wrong.
gsd-audit-fix
Autonomous audit-to-fix pipeline — find issues, classify, fix, test, commit.
gsd-ns-review
Route to the appropriate quality / review skill based on the user's intent. gsd-code-review-fix was absorbed by gsd-code-review --fix in #2790.
gsd-debug
Systematic debugging with persistent state across context resets.
gsd-graphify
Build, query, and inspect the project knowledge graph in .planning/graphs/.