Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add OpenDCAI/DataFlow-WebUI --skill bench-dataset-evaluator-questiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OpenDCAI/DataFlow-WebUIWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/opendcai/dataflow-webui/bench-dataset-evaluator-question)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/opendcai/dataflow-webui/bench-dataset-evaluator-question"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/opendcai/dataflow-webui/bench-dataset-evaluator-question/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/opendcai/dataflow-webui/bench-dataset-evaluator-question"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/opendcai/dataflow-webui/bench-dataset-evaluator-question.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Data Exfiltration · line 151 Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.01497 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00599 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00299 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00150 |
Grade A, and why
bench-dataset-evaluator-question scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 222 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
BenchDatasetEvaluatorQuestion Operator Reference
BenchDatasetEvaluatorQuestion extends BenchDatasetEvaluator with support for question context and subquestions.
1. Import
from dataflow.operators.core_text import BenchDatasetEvaluatorQuestion
2. Match Mode
Constructor
BenchDatasetEvaluatorQuestion(
eval_result_path=None,
compare_method="match",
)
| Parameter | Required | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
eval_result_path |
No | Auto-generated | Path to save evaluation statistics |
compare_method |
No | "match" |
Must be "match" |
system_prompt |
No | "You are a helpful assistant..." |
Not used in match mode |
llm_serving |
No | None |
Not used in match mode |
prompt_template |
No | AnswerJudgePromptQuestion |
Not used in match mode |
run() Signature
op.run(
storage=self.storage.step(),
input_question_key="question",
input_test_answer_key="generated_cot",
input_gt_answer_key="golden_answer",
)
# returns: list of column names
| Parameter | Required | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
storage |
Yes | None | Storage step object |
input_question_key |
No | "question" |
Question column |
input_test_answer_key |
No | "generated_cot" |
Predicted answer column |
input_gt_answer_key |
No | "golden_answer" |
Ground truth column |
Usage Example
from dataflow.operators.core_text import BenchDatasetEvaluatorQuestion
from dataflow.utils.storage import FileStorage
class MyPipeline:
def __init__(self):
self.storage = FileStorage(
first_entry_file_name="./data/bench.jsonl",
cache_path="./cache",
file_name_prefix="step",
cache_type="jsonl"
)
self.evaluator = BenchDatasetEvaluatorQuestion(
compare_method="match",
eval_result_path="./results/match_eval.json"
)
def forward(self):
self.evaluator.run(
storage=self.storage.step(),
input_question_key="question",
input_test_answer_key="predicted_answer",
input_gt_answer_key="ground_truth"
)
if __name__ == "__main__":
pipeline = MyPipeline()
pipeline.forward()
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 222 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A ad51097701ea
bench-dataset-evaluator-question is a skill published in the GitHub repository OpenDCAI/DataFlow-WebUI (253 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 1,497 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
cua-driver
Use Cua Driver for desktop or browser tasks that are awkward or unavailable through Bash/APIs, or when the user explicitly wants GUI interaction: app testing, visual bug reproduction, form filling, calendar entry, screenshots, and demo recording. Also covers Cua setup; not OpenAI Codex Computer Use or web research.
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.