Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add OpenDCAI/DataFlow-WebUI --skill prompted-evaluatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OpenDCAI/DataFlow-WebUIWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/opendcai/dataflow-webui/prompted-evaluator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/opendcai/dataflow-webui/prompted-evaluator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/opendcai/dataflow-webui/prompted-evaluator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/opendcai/dataflow-webui/prompted-evaluator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/opendcai/dataflow-webui/prompted-evaluator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Data Exfiltration · line 67 Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00718 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00287 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00144 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
prompted-evaluator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PromptedEvaluator Operator Reference
PromptedEvaluator uses an LLM to score each row of text (1-5) and writes the score into a new column without deleting any rows.
1. Import
from dataflow.operators.core_text import PromptedEvaluator
2. Constructor
PromptedEvaluator(
llm_serving=llm_serving,
system_prompt="Please evaluate the quality of this text on a scale from 1 to 5.",
)
| Parameter | Required | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
llm_serving |
Yes | None | LLM service object |
system_prompt |
No | "Please evaluate..." |
System prompt defining scoring criteria (1-5 scale) |
3. run() Signature
op.run(
storage=self.storage.step(),
input_key="raw_content",
output_key="eval",
)
# returns: output_key string
| Parameter | Required | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
storage |
Yes | None | Storage step object |
input_key |
No | "raw_content" |
Column containing text to evaluate |
output_key |
No | "eval" |
Column to write LLM scores into |
4. Usage Example
from dataflow.operators.core_text import PromptedEvaluator
from dataflow.serving import APILLMServing_request
from dataflow.utils.storage import FileStorage
class MyPipeline:
def __init__(self):
self.storage = FileStorage(
first_entry_file_name="./data/input.jsonl",
cache_path="./cache",
file_name_prefix="step",
cache_type="jsonl"
)
self.llm_serving = APILLMServing_request(
api_url="https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions",
key_name_of_api_key="DF_API_KEY",
model_name="gpt-4o",
max_workers=10
)
self.evaluator = PromptedEvaluator(
llm_serving=self.llm_serving,
system_prompt="Evaluate text quality on a scale from 1 to 5."
)
def forward(self):
self.evaluator.run(
storage=self.storage.step(),
input_key="content",
output_key="quality_score"
)
if __name__ == "__main__":
pipeline = MyPipeline()
pipeline.forward()
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 106 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 29a89961814b
prompted-evaluator is a skill published in the GitHub repository OpenDCAI/DataFlow-WebUI (253 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 718 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-platform-model-registry
Agent Platform Model Registry Management. Use when you need to upload, list, describe, update, or delete machine learning models (and their versions) in the Agent Platform Model Registry. Don't use for model training, model deployment to endpoints, or managing non-Agent Platform models.
foundry-config-setup
Resolve missing setup caused by a hardcoded Foundry project endpoint or model in a sample. Use when a sample fails because it uses a placeholder/hardcoded projectendpoint (for example "https://your-project.services.ai.azure.com") or a hardcoded model instead of reading them from the environment.
google-cloud-solution-agentic-analytics-spark-knowledge-catalog
Discovers requirements and designs an end-to-end governed agentic analytics solution using Knowledge Catalog and Managed Service for Apache Spark (Lightning Engine). Use when designing data science and analytics workflows across structured and unstructured distributed data (including in S3, Azure Blob, AlloyDB, and…
training-check
Interactively monitor training metrics from the current Codex session, periodically checking WandB or fallback logs for NaN, divergence, plateaus, and broken runs.
nemo-automodel-launcher-config
Configure NeMo AutoModel job launches for interactive runs, Slurm clusters, and SkyPilot cloud execution.
finetuning
Fine-tune models on Microsoft Foundry using SFT (supervised), DPO (preference), or RFT (reinforcement with graders). Covers dataset preparation, training job submission, deployment, and evaluation. USE FOR: fine-tune, SFT, DPO, RFT, training data, grader, distillation, fine-tuned model, training job, large file…