Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add OpenDCAI/DataFlow-WebUI --skill unified-bench-dataset-evaluatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OpenDCAI/DataFlow-WebUIWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/opendcai/dataflow-webui/unified-bench-dataset-evaluator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/opendcai/dataflow-webui/unified-bench-dataset-evaluator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/opendcai/dataflow-webui/unified-bench-dataset-evaluator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/opendcai/dataflow-webui/unified-bench-dataset-evaluator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/opendcai/dataflow-webui/unified-bench-dataset-evaluator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Data Exfiltration · line 106 Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.01589 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00794 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00318 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00159 |
Grade A, and why
unified-bench-dataset-evaluator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 201 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
UnifiedBenchDatasetEvaluator Operator Reference
UnifiedBenchDatasetEvaluator supports 6 evaluation types (eval_type), scores generated answers, and writes 4 output columns.
1. Import
from dataflow.operators.core_text import UnifiedBenchDatasetEvaluator
2. Constructor
UnifiedBenchDatasetEvaluator(
eval_type="key2_qa",
llm_serving=None,
prompt_template=None,
eval_result_path=None,
metric_type=None,
use_semantic_judge=False,
system_prompt="You are a helpful assistant specialized in evaluating answer correctness.",
)
IMPORTANT: Always pass prompt_template=None explicitly. The default value is AnswerJudgePrompt (the class itself), which triggers a TypeError.
| Parameter | Required | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
eval_type |
No | "key2_qa" |
Evaluation type |
llm_serving |
Conditional | None |
Required when use_semantic_judge=True |
prompt_template |
No | AnswerJudgePrompt |
Pass None to use built-in fallback |
eval_result_path |
No | Auto-generated | Statistics JSON file path |
metric_type |
No | None |
Evaluation metric, auto-selected if not provided |
use_semantic_judge |
No | False |
Use LLM for semantic judgment |
system_prompt |
No | "You are a helpful assistant..." |
System prompt for LLM (used when use_semantic_judge=True) |
eval_type and Required input_xxx_key
| eval_type | Required input_xxx_key |
|---|---|
key1_text_score |
input_text_key |
key2_qa |
input_question_key, input_target_key |
key2_q_ma |
input_question_key, input_targets_key |
key3_q_choices_a |
input_question_key, input_choices_key, input_label_key |
key3_q_choices_as |
input_question_key, input_choices_key, input_labels_key |
key3_q_a_rejected |
input_question_key, input_better_key, input_rejected_key |
3. run() Signature
op.run(
storage=self.storage.step(),
input_question_key="question",
input_target_key="golden_answer",
input_pred_key="generated_ans",
)
# returns: list of column names
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 201 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A eecadd30b046
unified-bench-dataset-evaluator is a skill published in the GitHub repository OpenDCAI/DataFlow-WebUI (234 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,589 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cli-eval
Create and run evaluation suites, watch live benchmark progress, view scorecards, compare model performance, and integrate eval runs with CI workflows from the CLI.
model-merging
Merge multiple fine-tuned models using mergekit to combine capabilities without retraining. Use when creating specialized models by blending domain-specific expertise (math + coding + chat), improving performance beyond single models, or experimenting rapidly with model variants. Covers SLERP, TIES-Merging, DARE, Task…
darwinian-evolver
Evolve prompts/regex/SQL/code with Imbue's evolution loop.
validate
Validate Semantica pipelines, extraction quality, graph schemas, and ontology consistency. Returns structured error/warning checklists. Uses PipelineValidator, PipelineBuilder.validatepipeline(), GraphValidator, and OntologyValidator. Sub-commands: pipeline, step, dependencies, extraction, graph, ontology, performance.
launching-evals
Run, monitor, analyze, and debug LLM evaluations via nemo-evaluator-launcher. Covers running evaluations, checking status and live progress, debugging failed runs, exporting artifacts and logs, and analyzing results. ALWAYS triggers on mentions of running evaluations, checking progress, debugging failed evals…
nemo-automodel-recipe-development
Create and modify NeMo AutoModel training and evaluation recipes, including YAML structure, builders, and execution flow.