Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator/main/.cursor/skills/safe-code-change/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operatorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator/safe-code-change)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator/safe-code-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator/safe-code-change/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator/safe-code-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator/safe-code-change.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.00809 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00324 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00162 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
safe-code-change scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 109 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Safe Code Change
After a code change is made, find and fix affected tests before running validation.
Rules
- The code change is already done. Do not modify production code.
- Only update tests to match the new behavior, not the other way around.
- Do not reformat or lint-fix during test updates. Save that for validation.
- If a test change is ambiguous (unclear what the new expected behavior is), ask the user.
Step 1: Identify What Changed
git diff --name-only
git diff --stat
List the modified production files (ignore test files, configs, docs).
Step 2: Find Affected Tests
Search for imports and uses of changed functions/types across all test files:
# Find test files that import the changed package
rg "github.com/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator/<changed_package>" --type go -g '*_test.go'
# Find direct function/type references
rg "<ChangedFunctionOrType>" --type go -g '*_test.go'
For controller or CLI changes, also check:
- Shared test helpers or fixtures under the same package
examples/YAMLs only if behavior affects documented shapes (usually not test code)
Step 3: Analyze Impact on Tests
For each affected test file, check whether the change breaks existing tests:
- Signature changes — function renamed, parameters added/removed/reordered.
- Behavior changes — return value, error messages, side effects differ.
- Removed code — tests for deleted functions/types need removal.
- New code — consider whether new tests are needed (ask user if unclear).
- Interface changes — mock implementations need updating.
Step 4: Update Tests
Apply minimal fixes to each affected test:
For Ginkgo Tests (if present):
- Update
Expect()assertions to match new return values - Update mock return values in test fixtures
- Add/remove parameters in function calls
- Update error message checks
- Adjust
Eventually()timeouts if reconciliation logic changed
For Standard Go Tests (typical in this repo):
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 109 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 11daf7061d0f
safe-code-change is a skill published in the GitHub repository openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator (15 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 809 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
cua-driver
Use Cua Driver for desktop or browser tasks that are awkward or unavailable through Bash/APIs, or when the user explicitly wants GUI interaction: app testing, visual bug reproduction, form filling, calendar entry, screenshots, and demo recording. Also covers Cua setup; not OpenAI Codex Computer Use or web research.
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.