parity

A procedure for checking whether the WebAssembly and native versions of a code-graph engine produce the same results. A code graph represents program elements and the relationships between them; a hybrid version is checked optionally.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to compare graph outputs across all resolution-test fixtures, restrict checks to selected languages, include the hybrid engine, or run an audit that reports differences without fixing them.
Why use it?
It finds differences between engine implementations and addresses the underlying cause instead of treating mismatched results as acceptable.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/optave/ops-codegraph-tool/parity
Any agent
npx skills add optave/ops-codegraph-tool --skill parity
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/optave/ops-codegraph-tool

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 29 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,099 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00029 $0.02099
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.01050
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00420
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00210

Measured yesterday against content hash a5fc8678c724, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

parity scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/parity/SKILL.md · 189 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 189 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/parity — Engine Correctness Parity Audit & Fix

Codegraph has two engines that MUST produce identical results (see CLAUDE.md):

  • wasm — JS pipeline + JS extractors + JS edge resolution
  • native — full Rust orchestrator (crates/codegraph-core/src/domain/graph/builder/pipeline.rs)
  • hybrid — JS pipeline + napi buildCallEdges (the fallback when the orchestrator is skipped: forced full rebuilds, older addons)

This skill runs scripts/parity-compare.mjs, which builds every resolution-benchmark fixture with each engine and compares the full node and edge multisets (kind, name, file, line, confidence, dynamic flag). Any difference is a bug in the less-accurate engine — never an acceptable gap, and never something to document as expected. The skill finds the root cause, fixes it, and re-verifies until the audit is clean.

Arguments

  • $ARGUMENTS may contain:
    • --langs a,b,c — restrict to specific fixture names (e.g. javascript,pts-javascript)
    • --hybrid — also audit the hybrid path (recommended; slower)
    • --audit-only — report divergences without fixing them
    • No arguments — full audit across all fixtures, then fix divergences

Phase 0 — Pre-flight

All steps run from the repo root.

  1. Confirm scripts/parity-compare.mjs exists. If not, this repo doesn't have the parity tooling — stop and report.
  2. Build the TypeScript dist (the script imports dist/index.js, and extractor changes in src/ are invisible until rebuilt):
    npm run build
    
  3. Ensure the native addon reflects the local Rust source:
    cd crates/codegraph-core && npx napi build --platform --release && cd ../..
    
    On macOS, locally built binaries must be re-signed or Node kills the process (exit 137):
    codesign --sign - --force crates/codegraph-core/*.node
    
  4. Verify the loader picks up the locally built binary, not the published package. First check which path is actually resolved:
    node -e "
      const { createRequire } = require('node:module');
      const r = createRequire(require.resolve('./dist/index.js'));
      try { console.log(r.resolve('codegraph-core')); } catch { console.log('not found via require'); }
    "
    
    If the resolved path points to node_modules/@optave/codegraph-<platform>-<arch>/codegraph-core.node (the installed package), copy your freshly built binary over it:
    cp crates/codegraph-core/*.node node_modules/@optave/codegraph-<platform>-<arch>/codegraph-core.node
    
    Then confirm the loader picks it up:
    node -e "import('./dist/infrastructure/native.js').then(m => console.log(m.isNativeAvailable()))"
    
    If false, stop and report — auditing parity without the native engine is meaningless.

Read the full file on GitHub · 189 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 189 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A a5fc8678c724

Subscribe to this mod's changes

parity is a skill published in the GitHub repository optave/ops-codegraph-tool (92 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 2,099 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

codespaces

Build and query architecture-aware code search, dependency graphs, call flows, impact analysis, and belief maps for Python, TypeScript, TSX, Rust, C#, Java, Go, Ruby, and Ruby on Rails repositories. Use before non-trivial code changes to find module boundaries, blast radius, architecture violations, and the minimal…

diskd-ai/codespaces · 74 tokens

security-triage

Turn a large codebase into a short, ranked reading list of security-relevant code paths worth a human researcher's time, using the flyto-indexer MCP tools. Use when asked to find, prioritize, or triage potential vulnerabilities / taint flows / attack surface in a repository indexed (or indexable) by flyto-indexer …

flytohub/flyto-indexer · 105 tokens

devlens

Understand a codebase with the DevLens MCP — TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Rust, or Java (incl. React/Next.js/Node, FastAPI/Flask/Django, Spring Boot, Gin/Echo/chi/net-http, axum/actix/rocket). Query a precomputed graph of nodes (components, hooks, functions, classes, methods, structs, traits, routes) and typed…

devlensio/devlensOSS · 0 tokens

archon

Multi-language dependency impact analysis for Java, JS/TS, and Python codebases. Answers "if I change this, what breaks?" Run /archon diff before refactoring, /archon analyze for full dependency maps.

Schr0d/Archon · 48 tokens

codebase-intelligence

Query the codebase-intelligence CLI to understand TypeScript architecture, dependencies, blast radius, and risk before reading files. Use for any "how is this structured", "what breaks if I change X", "where is the complexity" question.

bntvllnt/codebase-intelligence · 54 tokens

repomix

Pack and analyze codebases into AI-friendly single files using Repomix. Use when the user wants to explore repositories, analyze code structure, find patterns, check token counts, or prepare codebase context for AI analysis. Supports both local directories and remote GitHub repositories.

yamadashy/repomix · 58 tokens