Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills --skill code-refactoring-patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills/code-refactoring-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills/code-refactoring-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills/code-refactoring-patterns/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills/code-refactoring-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills/code-refactoring-patterns.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 345 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium Excessive Agency · line 394 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.01981 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00991 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00396 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00198 |
Grade A, and why
code-refactoring-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 402 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Refactoring Patterns
A comprehensive guide to refactoring code systematically while maintaining functionality and improving quality.
When to Refactor
- Code smells detected (duplicated code, long functions, etc.)
- Before adding new features to complex areas
- After understanding improves ("now I see a better way")
- When tests are in place
- Performance optimization needed
Refactoring Rules
- Never refactor without tests: Write tests first if they don't exist
- Small steps: Make one change at a time
- Run tests after each change: Ensure nothing breaks
- Commit often: Each working refactor is a commit
- Don't mix refactoring with feature work: Separate concerns
Common Code Smells
1. Long Method/Function
Smell: Functions over 20-30 lines
Refactor: Extract Method
// Before
function processOrder(order: Order) {
// Validate order (10 lines)
// Calculate totals (15 lines)
// Apply discounts (12 lines)
// Send confirmation (8 lines)
}
// After
function processOrder(order: Order) {
validateOrder(order);
const totals = calculateTotals(order);
const finalPrice = applyDiscounts(totals, order);
sendConfirmation(order, finalPrice);
}
2. Duplicated Code
Smell: Same code in multiple places
Refactor: Extract Function/Class
// Before
function formatUserName(user: User) {
return `${user.firstName} ${user.lastName}`;
}
function formatAuthorName(author: Author) {
return `${author.firstName} ${author.lastName}`;
}
// After
function formatFullName(person: { firstName: string; lastName: string }) {
return `${person.firstName} ${person.lastName}`;
}
3. Long Parameter List
Smell: Functions with 4+ parameters
Refactor: Parameter Object
// Before
function createUser(
firstName: string,
lastName: string,
email: string,
phone: string,
address: string
) { }
// After
interface UserDetails {
firstName: string;
lastName: string;
email: string;
phone: string;
address: string;
}
function createUser(details: UserDetails) { }
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 402 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 96cf227b2ff8
code-refactoring-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills (17 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 1,981 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
python-code-quality
Code quality checks, linting, formatting, and type checking commands for the Agent Framework Python codebase. Use this when running checks, fixing lint errors, or troubleshooting CI failures.
node-zombie-guardian
Use when diagnosing stale or orphaned Node.js processes launched by VCO, auditing ownership/liveness, or safely simulating cleanup without touching external Node workloads.
atmos-schemas
JSON Schema for Atmos: stack-manifest and atmos.yaml config schemas, IDE auto-completion, validate stacks/schema/config, SchemaStore integration.
atmos-diagnostics
Atmos diagnostics: machine-readable JSONL event streams, diagnostics.enabled/file/includeoutput, subprocess start/end/output events, masking, and debugging Atmos execution.
architecture-optimization
Guided journey from a working codebase grown slow and tangled to one measurably fast, cleanly bounded, and readable. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - working-with-legacy-code, clean-architecture, software-design-philosophy, refactoring-patterns, system-design, ddia-systems, release-it, pragmatic-programmer …
release-it
Build production-ready systems with stability patterns: circuit breakers, bulkheads, timeouts, and retry logic. Use when the user mentions "production outage", "circuit breaker", "deployment pipeline", "chaos engineering", "retry storm", "health checks", "my service keeps crashing", "prevent cascading failures", or…