ui-review

ui-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp. It costs 11 tokens per session (375 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review process for checking a user interface for accessibility, usability, responsive behavior, and clear loading, error, empty, and success states.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review screens or components and produce prioritized fixes for accessibility and user experience issues.
Why use it?
It finds problems that can block users, including poor keyboard navigation, missing labels, weak contrast, unclear errors, and broken layouts.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

Good fit Use it to review screens or components and produce prioritized fixes for accessibility and user experience issues.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/ui-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp --skill ui-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ui-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/ui-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/ui-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/ui-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/ui-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for ui-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/ui-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/ui-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 11 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 375 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00011 $0.00375
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00187
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00075
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00038

Measured 8d ago against content hash bef6c5c972ae, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ui-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/ui-review/SKILL.md · 50 lines

What it actually says

/ui-review — Actionable UX and accessibility review

Purpose

Make user-facing changes accessible, usable, and consistent.

Invocation

/ui-review <screen or component>

Accepted input

The UI change and any design system in use.

Prerequisites

A user-facing change to review.

Procedure

  1. Check accessibility: semantic HTML, ARIA, keyboard and focus order, contrast.
  2. Verify loading, empty, error, and success states.
  3. Check forms: labels, validation, and error recovery.
  4. Assess hierarchy, spacing, responsiveness, and design-system consistency.
  5. Separate blocking issues from polish; give each a concrete remediation.

Approval points

None; output feeds /fix.

Expected output

A prioritized list of blocking issues and polish, each with a fix.

Failure behavior

If the UI cannot be exercised, report what is missing and stop.

Completion checks

  • Exercise keyboard, focus, accessible names, contrast, zoom/responsiveness, reduced motion, forms, and relevant asynchronous states.
  • Every blocking issue names the affected component, reproduction path, user impact, and concrete remediation; cite WCAG where applicable.
  • Record untested environments or assistive technologies instead of implying complete coverage.

Agents and skills

Agent: ux-reviewer. Skill: ui-review.

Apply context-discovery before broad scanning: use a supplied context capsule first; otherwise check context frontmatter freshness, read .agent/context/routing.md, load only relevant summaries, and verify critical claims against source.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 50 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A bef6c5c972ae

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ui-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 375 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

chakra-ui-builder

Build responsive, accessible UI components and layouts using Chakra UI v3, install or configure Chakra UI in new and existing projects, and design scalable themes using tokens, semantic tokens, recipes, and slot recipes. Use this skill whenever a user asks to build, create, or generate any UI component, page, form…

chakra-ui/chakra-ui · 214 tokens

visual-ralph

Visual Ralph orchestration for frontend UI from generated references, static references, or live URL targets, using $ralph with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence until the implementation matches and leaves a reproducible design system.

Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex · 50 tokens

frontend-visual-qa

Audits already-rendered web, landing-page, HTML deck/slide, browser tool/game, dashboard/admin, design-system, and desktop UIs using real-browser or native-app journeys, inspected screenshots, DOM geometry, responsive or projection viewports, and a bundled Playwright sweep. Use after UI implementation to find…

daymade/claude-code-skills · 145 tokens

prototype-web

A clickable, high-fidelity web product prototype with navigation, a hero section, feature cards, steps, social proof, and optional pricing. It is designed to resemble a finished landing page while remaining a prototype.

nexu-io/html-anything · 24 tokens

animation-principles

Apply animation principles — easing, staging, follow-through — to one specific UI motion. Use when tuning how an animation feels. For product-wide duration and easing tokens use motion-system (design-systems); for a full interaction spec use micro-interaction-spec.

Owl-Listener/designer-skills · 59 tokens

refactoring-ui

Audit and fix visual hierarchy, spacing, color, and depth in web UIs. Use when the user mentions "my UI looks off" (or amateur/unprofessional), "fix the design", "Tailwind styling", "color palette", "visual hierarchy", "design system", "spacing scale", or "component styling". Also trigger when building consistent…

wondelai/skills · 132 tokens