Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ostin-pil/aboard --skill verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ostin-pil/aboardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ostin-pil/aboard/verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ostin-pil/aboard/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ostin-pil/aboard/verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ostin-pil/aboard/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ostin-pil/aboard/verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00151 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00060 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00030 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Check the current state of the aboard project:
- Type-check:
npx tsc --noEmit 2>&1 | tail -20 - Lint:
npm run lint 2>&1 | tail -20 - List all source files under
src/and their line counts - Note presence of key surfaces (graph view, claim detail, dossier, JSON-LD endpoints, agent forecast generation script)
- If on a feature branch, note the branch name and what it targets
- Report: what's done, what's next, any type or lint issues
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 15 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 005fa9ae9df4
verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository ostin-pil/aboard (2 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 151 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
api-errors
McpError constructor, JsonRpcErrorCode reference, and error handling patterns for @cyanheads/mcp-ts-core. Use when looking up error codes, understanding where errors should be thrown vs. caught, or using ErrorHandler.tryCatch in services.
api-linter
MCP definition linter rules reference. Use when bun run lint:mcp or bun run devcheck reports a lint error or warning (format-parity, schema-is-object, name-format, server-json-, etc.) and you need to understand the rule, its severity, and how to fix it. Every rule ID the linter emits has an entry in this doc.
report-issue-framework
File a bug or feature request against @cyanheads/mcp-ts-core when you hit a framework issue. Use when a builder, utility, context method, or config behaves contrary to the documented API — not for server-specific application bugs.
report-issue-local
File a bug or feature request against this MCP server's own repo. Use for server-specific issues — tool logic, service integrations, config problems, or domain bugs that aren't caused by the framework.
debug-optimize-lcp
Guides debugging and optimizing Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) using Chrome DevTools MCP tools. Use this skill whenever the user asks about LCP performance, slow page loads, Core Web Vitals optimization, or wants to understand why their page's main content takes too long to appear. Also use when the user mentions…
systematic-debugging
Use when debugging a failing test, build error, or runtime issue that isn't immediately obvious. Guides a 4-phase root cause analysis instead of random fix attempts.