Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add OutlineDriven/outline-driven-development --skill copywriting-ctagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OutlineDriven/outline-driven-developmentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/outlinedriven/outline-driven-development/copywriting-cta)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/outlinedriven/outline-driven-development/copywriting-cta"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/outlinedriven/outline-driven-development/copywriting-cta/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/outlinedriven/outline-driven-development/copywriting-cta"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/outlinedriven/outline-driven-development/copywriting-cta.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 25 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.02143 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01071 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00429 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00214 |
Grade A, and why
copywriting-cta scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
End-of-article CTA designer
Contract
| Field | Bound contract |
|---|---|
| Trigger | User asks to design or review a bottom-of-article CTA. |
| Authority | Read-only. No file, VCS, credential, paid, published, deployed, or remote mutation. Produces a recommendation in the conversation only. |
| Side effect | No state outside the conversation. |
| Done | Complete CTA recommendation (copy, form, mechanism, tests, a11y) with anti-pattern warnings. |
Inputs
Required from the user (ask one question at a time with 2-4 tappable options; skip any already answered; fall back to free text only if the answer cannot be enumerated):
- Article context: Personal/independent blog or essay · Newsletter/paid publication · Brand/company/content-marketing blog · Other.
- Primary objective: Newsletter/email subscription · Social follow · Lead generation (gated asset) · Product/service signup or free trial · Demo or sales call booking · Direct purchase · Community join · Engagement (reply/comment/share) · Reader support (paid sub/tip) · Try-it/direct action · Other. If the user lists more than one, ask which is primary; choosing multiple objectives is the dominant cause of CTA failure.
- Audience and relationship: First-time visitor · Returning reader, not subscribed · Existing subscriber/customer · Mixed/unknown.
- Funnel stage: TOFU (discovery, no buying intent) · MOFU (evaluating, comparing) · BOFU (ready to act) · Not applicable.
- Mechanism preference (ask only if a mechanism could legitimately help; for skeptical or repeat-reader audiences default to "None / value-only" without asking): None/value-only · Curiosity gap · Reciprocity (free asset first) · Discount/offer · Urgency (real deadline) · Scarcity/FOMO · Social proof.
Optional: free-text constraints the user volunteers (length limit, brand voice, no popups, language, formality).
Procedure
- Interview. Ask the five inputs above in order, one at a time, skipping any already supplied. Capture volunteered constraints. Done when: all five inputs are collected or reported missing.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 122 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A 9fe5e4a0b4d2
copywriting-cta is a skill published in the GitHub repository OutlineDriven/outline-driven-development (52 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 2,143 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
audit-project
Run an iterative multi-agent code audit until critical and high findings are resolved. Use when the user says "audit my code", "find all the bugs", "deep code audit", "iterative review", or "review until clean".
duet
Use when the user invokes /duet, says "pair with me", or faces aesthetic, architectural, or irreversible decisions.
goal-prompt-drafting
Use when asked to draft copy-ready /goal objectives for long-running agents; returns one normalized one-line objective with measurable end state, grounded proof, easy-out invariants, a stop clause, and a Missing list. Not for source or remote-system changes.
handoff-prompt
Use when the user asks for a handoff, delegation, or clipboard-ready prompt for another agent: a standalone path-free prompt copied to the clipboard, confirmed by title. Not for session-snapshot briefs — use handoff; never remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible.
publish-branch
Use when asked to publish the checked-out branch: commit and push it on whatever branch it is, the default branch included. Not for creating branches, PRs, force pushes, or pushing any other branch; when the request excludes the default branch, use commit-push-current.
drill
Use when a concept needs practising rather than explaining: run a scaffolded exercise from worked example to independent problem, quiz the learner, run spaced recall over what they cleared, or probe for the gaps blocking what they want next. For explanation, use explain-concept; for an end-to-end build, use capstone.