Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add OutlineDriven/outline-driven-development --skill fix-p0-issuesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OutlineDriven/outline-driven-developmentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/outlinedriven/outline-driven-development/fix-p0-issues)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/outlinedriven/outline-driven-development/fix-p0-issues"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/outlinedriven/outline-driven-development/fix-p0-issues.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 39 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.01204 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00602 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00241 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00120 |
Grade A, and why
fix-p0-issues scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- fix-p0-issues — 95% identical, 2 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Fix P0 issues
Contract
| Field | Bound contract |
|---|---|
| Trigger | User asks to fix P0s, address critical issues, or work on priorities from the weekly product briefing. |
| Authority | Human-only. No agent is spawned without explicit user confirmation. Remote mutation is limited to spawning ODIN cloud coding agents for triaged, actionable P0s. |
| Side effect | Triages P0s, spawns high-confidence agents, and reports run IDs and monitoring commands. |
| Done | Actionable P0s have run IDs; skipped items are documented; no agent runs without user confirmation. |
Inputs
- The repository root, resolved via
git rev-parse --show-toplevel. - The most recent weekly product briefing under
reports/weekly_product_briefings/*.md. - Optional: GitHub issue numbers embedded in briefing P0 sections as
#NNNN.
Procedure
- Resolve the repository root. Find the most recent briefing by sorting filenames, which contain
YYYY-MM-DDdates. Do not usels -tbecause filesystem modification times are unreliable in freshly cloned repos.
Done when: the most recent briefing is identified by path.REPO_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel) ls "$REPO_ROOT/reports/weekly_product_briefings/"*.md 2>/dev/null | sort | tail -1 - Parse the briefing for sections starting with
#### P0:. For each P0, extract the title (text after#### P0:), GitHub issue numbers (#NNNNpatterns), the problem description paragraph(s), and any engineering-alignment notes. Done when: every P0 section is parsed with title, issue numbers, description, and alignment notes. - When a P0 includes issue numbers, fetch the GitHub issue details (
gh issue view <issue_number> --repo <org>/<repo>). Then search the codebase using keywords from the issue. Document relevant file paths, related code or tests, and dependencies. Done when: every P0 with issue numbers has its issue fetched and codebase searched. - Triage each P0 into one category and record the decision:
- Inactionable Complaint: no specific description, reproduction steps, or fix indication. Skip; note in the report.
- Bug Fix: clearly scoped, has reproduction steps or a clear error, narrow scope, identifiable root cause. Decision: Spawn Agent.
- Feature Request: assess scope (Small 1-2 files, Medium 3-10 files, Large 10+ files or architectural), complexity, and confidence 1-5. Confidence 5 or 4 → Spawn Agent (4 with caveats); 3 or lower → Skip and note. Skip any P0 the briefing notes is already being addressed on an active branch. Do not spawn more than 3 agents at once. Done when: every P0 has a category and decision recorded.
- For each P0 marked Spawn Agent, construct a prompt containing the issue number and title, problem description, fetched issue details, relevant file paths, and task (investigate, implement fix, add or update tests, create a PR with a clear description). Present the full spawn plan to the user, including P0 titles, issue numbers, categories, confidence, decisions, and constructed prompts. Obtain explicit confirmation before proceeding. Do not spawn any agent without confirmation. Done when: the spawn plan is presented and explicit confirmation is obtained or refused.
- For each confirmed P0, spawn an ODIN cloud coding agent:
Use exactlyodin agent run-cloud \ --environment <ODIN_ENVIRONMENT_ID> \ --prompt "<constructed prompt>"odinto spawn cloud agents. Ifodinis not available, stop and report the error rather than substituting another binary. Done when: every confirmed P0 has a cloud agent spawned (orodinis unavailable and the skill stops). - Record each spawned agent's run ID and emit the report described in Output. Done when: every spawned agent's run ID is recorded and the report is emitted.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 80 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 4120605faabf
fix-p0-issues is a skill published in the GitHub repository OutlineDriven/outline-driven-development (52 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 1,204 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
drift-detect
Use when the user says "plan drift", asks whether the roadmap, plans, or docs still match the code, or is deciding what to rebuild when restarting a stalled project. For doc-vs-code drift inside a specific diff, use sync-docs.
github-backlog-triage
Use when the user invokes backlog triage for a GitHub repo's open issues and PRs. Not for proactive triage, non-GitHub trackers, or single bug issues: use github-bug-report-triage.
setup-repo-skills
Use when the user wants one-time repository setup for tracker, triage labels, and domain conventions. Not for ongoing triage, issue creation, or multi-repo setup.
git-history-analysis
Use when the user asks about recent engineering work, what the team is working on, planning or roadmap material, or an explicitly requested Slack summary. Not for remote or irreversible changes.
graph-backbone
Use when defining, revising, or gate-replanning the project structural backbone in project-root graph.yaml; produces a validated approved revision preserving immutable topology and additive metadata. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.
wontfix
Use when the user wants to elicit refused directions, generalize them, and close matching tracker items as not planned. Not for duplicates, spam, or items closed as completed or obsolete.