MegaLinter is a repository analysis tool that runs linters and related checks across source code, infrastructure-as-code, configuration, scripts, formats, spelling, copy-pastes, and security issues. It is for teams that want automated quality checks in GitHub Actions, other CI systems, or local development. The catalogue add-ons help coding agents use and configure MegaLinter and respond to its findings.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/oxsecurity/megalinter/add-linternpx skills add oxsecurity/megalinter --skill add-lintergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oxsecurity/megalinterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/oxsecurity/megalinter/add-linter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oxsecurity/megalinter/add-linter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oxsecurity/megalinter/add-linter.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00033 | $0.02079 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01040 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00416 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00208 |
Grade A, and why
add-linter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 148 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 7a0e2500b7d1
add-linter is a skill published in the GitHub repository oxsecurity/megalinter (2,577 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 2,079 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
implement
Research, implement, test, document, and review a Fallow feature, fix, refactor, or repository improvement. Use when asked to build or change Fallow.
open-draft-pr
Prepare local changes for review with an intentional commit, push, and ready PR for fallow. Use when the user wants to publish work, open a PR, or turn local changes into a reviewable branch.
browser-smoke-review
Use browser automation to review docs pages, preview URLs, rendered output, or web-facing fallow surfaces. Use when the user wants a screenshot-based review, browser smoke test, docs site check, or preview deployment inspection.
debug-false-positive
Diagnose and fix a Fallow false positive or false negative through extraction, resolution, graph, analysis, reporting, and real-consumer verification.
panel-review-loop
Iteratively review and improve a Fallow user-facing surface across representative real-world projects until the panel has no blocking concerns.
panel-review
Review a Fallow design, plan, workflow, CLI surface, documentation architecture, or user experience with representative end-user and domain-expert perspectives before implementation.