Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/p2ergmbh/agentic-coding/review-performancenpx skills add P2ERGmbH/agentic-coding --skill review-performancegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/P2ERGmbH/agentic-codingWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00019 | $0.01316 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00658 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00263 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00132 |
Grade A, and why
review-performance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 83 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Performance Review Workflow
This workflow guides you through standardizing the performance testing and review of specific pages in the application.
Role & Persona
You are an expert performance engineer and autonomous agent.
Trigger
Use this workflow whenever the user asks to "run the review-performance workflow", "review performance for [URL]", or as a subsequent step during the github-issue-test workflow.
Phase 1: URL Selection and Route Resolution
- URL Identification:
- If a URL is provided by the user (e.g.,
https://www.your-domain.com/de/product/some-productorhttp://localhost:6767/de/provider/...), use it. - If NO URL is provided, fetch
http://localhost:6767/sitemap.xml, parse it, and pick a random URL from the sitemap to test.
- If a URL is provided by the user (e.g.,
- Route Pattern Matching:
- Extract the locale (e.g.,
de,en,fr) and the remaining path from the selected URL. - Map the path to the corresponding route pattern. Inspect the configuration for
paths.src(e.g.src/or.) and search for any i18n pathnames files (paths.src/i18n/pathnames.tsor equivalent i18n configurations). If i18n configurations do not exist, map directly to the route segments. - Example:
.../de/provider/provider-1/product/item-9maps to the pattern/provider/[slug]/product/[productSlug].
- Extract the locale (e.g.,
- File Resolution:
- Translate the mapped route pattern into the corresponding Next.js file path within the configured app pages directory (e.g.
paths.apporsrc/app). - Example: The pattern
/provider/[slug]/product/[productSlug]resolves to<paths.app>/[locale]/provider/[slug]/product/[productSlug]/page.tsx(or<paths.app>/provider/[slug]/product/[productSlug]/page.tsxif non-localized). - Identify this file as the starting point for fixing performance issues. If the path does not exist, search dynamically using codebase tools to locate the page component.
- Translate the mapped route pattern into the corresponding Next.js file path within the configured app pages directory (e.g.
Phase 2: Automated Performance Analysis
- Initialize Browser & Trace:
- Ensure the
chrome-devtoolsMCP is available. - Use
navigate_pageto go to the target URL. - Wait for the page to visually stabilize.
- Use
performance_start_tracewithreload: trueto begin capturing frontend performance issues, Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS), and page load speed.
- Ensure the
- Stop Trace & Gather Insights:
- After the page has fully loaded, use
performance_stop_trace. - Analyze the generated trace file. Look for specific Performance Insights returned by the DevTools.
- If necessary, use
performance_analyze_insighton specific blocking issues or layout shifts to get detailed information on what caused them. - Holistic Quality Audit: Do not use Lighthouse as a fallback for performance traces. Instead, use
lighthouse_auditas a complementary check to generate a structured report specifically targeting Accessibility (a11y), SEO, and web Best Practices regressions.
- After the page has fully loaded, use
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 83 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A e643c2733863
review-performance is a skill published in the GitHub repository P2ERGmbH/agentic-coding (9 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 1,316 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…